Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
In their rare comments on Existentialism, contemporary British philosophers, with a few notable exceptions, frequently ridicule the use of “nothing” by such writers as Sartre and Heidegger. And when it is discovered that these writers maintain that the contemplation of nothingness gives rise to anguish, this ridicule is expressed even more strongly. What may be taken as a typical example of this tendency are Professor Ayer's remarks in his Horizon articles on Sartre. (Horizon, Vol. XII, 1945, pp. 12–26 and 101–10.) A characteristic quotation runs as follows: “In particular, Sartre's reasoning on the subject of le néant seems to me exactly on a par with that of the King in Alice through the Looking-Glass … The point is that words like ‘nothing” and ‘nobody” are not used as the names of something insubstantial and mysterious; they are not used to name anything at all”; (p. 18).
1 All translations from the French are my own. I have included at the end of the article a list of passages quoted from ĹEtre et le Néant with the corresponding pages in Miss Hazel Barnes's translation. (Being and Nothingness. By Jean-Paul Sartre. Trans, by Hazel E. Barnes. (Methuen, 1957.))