Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:22:38.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Right and Good: False Dichotomy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Anne Maclean
Anne Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 60 , Issue 231 , January 1985 , pp. 129 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 P., H. Nowell-Smith, Ethics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1954), 13; quoted by Pybus on p. 20.Google Scholar

2 P., T. Geach, The Virtues (Cambridge University Press, 1977). Page references to this book will be given in the text.Google Scholar

3 For a fuller treatment of some of the points discussed here, together with other relevant material, see my ‘The Pros and Cons of Consequentialism’, Philosophy 56, No. 218 (October 1981), 497-516.