Article contents
Representation in Music
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
Music may be used to express emotion, to heighten a drama, to emphasize the meaning of a ceremony; but it is nevertheless an abstract art, with no power to represent the world. Representation, as I understand it, is a property that does not belong to music.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1976
References
1 Cooke, Deryck, The Language of Music (Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar.
2 See, for example, Wollheim, R., Art and its Objects (New York, 1968)Google Scholar; Goodman, N., Languages of Art (London, 1969)Google Scholar; and, in relation to the present subject: Urmson, J. O., ‘Representation in Music’, in Philosophy and the Arts, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. 6, 1971–1972 (London, 1973)Google Scholar.
3 Cf. Frege's strictly comparable idea that only in the context of a sentence do words have ‘Bedeutung’, and the holistic view of language which springs from that insight: see Dummett, M., Frege: Philosophy of Language (London, 1973)Google Scholar.
4 Many considerations relevant to the logical status of sounds are raised by Strawson, in Individuals, chs. 1 and 2 (London, 1959).
5 On the question what might be meant by a ‘strictly visual property’ see the admirable discussion in Grice, H. P., ‘Some Remarks about the Senses’ in Butler, R. J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, First Series (Oxford, 1966)Google Scholar.
6 It is precisely such a model of musical understanding that is implicit in Howard's, V. A. attempt to apply Goodman's theory of representation to music: see ‘On Representational Music’, Noûs, 1972Google Scholar.
7 For further remarks on ‘understanding music’ see my Art and Imagination, ch. 12 (London, 1974).
- 9
- Cited by