Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:48:31.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationality and Paternalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

E. P. Brandon
E. P. Brandon
Affiliation:
University of the West Indies, Jamaica
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 57 , Issue 222 , October 1982 , pp. 533 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trevor Pat ‘Class, Consciousness, Control, Communication’, Radical Philosophy 5 (Summer 1973), 27.

2 Geoffrey Scarre, ‘Children and Paternalism’, Philosophy 55 (1980), 123. Scarre is replying to Francis Schrag, ‘The Child in the Moral Order’, Philosophy 52 (1977), 167–177, who likewise desperately wishes to bolster up the moral significance of the adult/child distinction, at the cost even of a type of ‘noble lie’. For my comments on this, and for a slightly different development of other points made by Schrag, see ‘The Key of the Door’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 11 (1979), 23–34.

3 Scarre's phrase ‘when their irrationality threatens their well-being’ (p. 124) is crucially ambiguous between unproblematic cases of legitimate interference where ignorance or insouciance is going to lead to unforeseen and definitely unwanted disaster and cases where the person interfering decides for himself what is to count as well-being. Scarre needs a justification for a general regimentation such as, it seems, the justification of the former type of interference will never yield.

4 I have attempted to say a little about this conception of morality in the article cited above and to argue for its consonance with Mackie's version of subjectivism in 'Subjectivism and Seriousness’, Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1980), 97–107.

5 J. Z. Young, ‘The Pineal Gland’, Philosophy 48 (1973), 72.

6 Pierre Bourdieu and Jean-Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, translated by Richard Nice (London: Sage Publications,1977)