Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:23:37.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Race and Individual Merit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

John Cottingham
Affiliation:
University of Reading

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Although outlawing numerical quotas, Powell did allow race to be ‘taken into account’: e.g. a university might legitimately seek to ensure ‘ethnic diversity’ among its student body. I do not here discuss whether this concession can be reconciled with the principle of individual consideration.

2 ‘Solomon and the Bakke Case’, The Listener, 28 09 1978, 390–1. Italics mine.Google Scholar

3 An example of such a ‘redefinition’ occurs in a recent paper which proposes one concept of merit according to which an individual merits a job if his placement in that job contributes to productivity. Daniels, Norman, ‘Merit and Meritocracy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 7, No. 3 (Spring 1978), 212213.Google Scholar

4 Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977), Ch. 9.Google Scholar

5 Op. cit., 232.

6 Op. cit., 225. More recently, Dworkin has directly endorsed the view that race may be considered a species of merit (in the BBC TV series Dilemmas, broadcast June 1978).

7 The right to be considered on one's merits may also have to be balanced against an employer's—or perhaps at any rate a private employer's—alleged right to select whom he fancies for a job. See further Thomson, J. J., ‘Preferential Hiring’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1973), 364384.Google Scholar

8 Some versions of this argument may toy with the ‘redefinition’ ploy attacked above. Thus Karst: ‘Society may reasonably look to potential contributions as well as past achievements in denning “merit”’ (op. cit.).

10 Though not a relevant consideration per se, skin colour might be relevant given certain additional circumstances, e.g. where a particular candidate has, merely because of his black skin, habitually received less time and attention from his school teachers.

11 I am indebted to my colleague, Dr Jim Tiles, for helpful criticism of an earlier version of this paper.