Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T10:35:17.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Confidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Nathan Rotenstreich
Nathan Rotenstreich
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Confidence or trust is obviously a sort of reliance or dependence. Confidence is related to fiducia, which in turn is related to fido and to the Greek peitho. The latter term implies persuasion or persuasiveness. If we follow, as we should, the nuances hidden in these terms, we may assume that confidence is a reliance stemming from persuasion or accompanied by it. Confidence may be related to a person, including oneself, and in this sense we speak of self-confidence; or it may be related to another person, either in the singular or in the plural, or even perhaps to the course of events at large, to history, to the cosmos, to God etc. It is in this sense that confidence is the opposite of or contradictory to fear. And Aristotle indeed placed the brave man between the two poles of fear and confidence. The man who exceeds in confidence is rash, and he who exceeds in fear and falls short in confidence is a coward.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 182 , October 1972 , pp. 348 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nicomachean Ethics 1107 b.Google Scholar

2 Kritik der Reinen Vernunft B. p. 845Google Scholar; Smith, Kemp's transl. London, 1965 p. 645.Google Scholar

3 H. M. Clark Trow: The Psychology of Confidence, An Experimental Enquiry included in Archive of Psychology, ed. by G. R. S. Woodworth. No. 67, 11 1923, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

4 Bloch, Ernst: Das Prinzip der Hoffnung, 1. Band Frankfurt a/m, 1967, p. 82.Google Scholar

6 Goffman, Irving: Interaction Ritual, Essays In Face-To-Face Behaviour, Chicago, 1967, p. 45.Google Scholar

7 op. cit., p. 120.Google Scholar

8 On the religious aspect of confidence consult: Werblowsky, R. J. Zwi: “Faith, Hope and Trust: a Study of the Concept of Bittahon” included in: Papers of the Institute of Jewish Studies, London, ed. Weiss, J. G., vol. I, Jerusalem 1967 pp. 95–139.Google Scholar

9 There is a certain parallelism between the assumption of constancy as implied in expectation and confidence in general, and the assumption of constancy in the phenomenon of responsibility. Consult on this: Ingarden, Roman: Über die Verantwortung; Ihre Ontischen Fundamente Stuttgart, 1970, mainly pp. 51 ff.Google Scholar

10 Herrmann, D. W.: Ethik 3, Tübingen 1904, p. 32.Google Scholar

11 Luhmann, Niclas: Vertrauen, Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion Sozialer Komplexität, Stuttgart 1968, p. 36.Google Scholar

12 An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislation by Bentham, Jeremy, Oxford MXMVII, p. 37.Google Scholar

13 Lucas, J. R., “True” Philosophy, 07 1969, vol. XLIV, p. 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Scheler, Max: Zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Sympathiegefühle und Liebe und Hass, Halle, a–S. 1913 pp. 1, 47.Google Scholar

15 Luhman, op. cit., p. 78.Google Scholar

16 On Confidence in general: the works of Marcel, Gabriel, “Homo viator” Paris 1945Google Scholar and “Etre et Avoir” Paris 1935Google Scholar are of special significance. Consult also two books by Bollnow, Otto Friedrich, Wesen und Wandel der Tugenden Frankfurt–Main, 1958, pp. 155 ffGoogle Scholar. as well as Neue Geborgenheit. Das Problem, einer Uberwindung des Exist-enzialismus Stuttgart and Köln 1955, pp. 22 and 131 ff.Google Scholar

17 Pfänder, A.: Zur Psychologie der Gesinnungen, I. Teil, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänemenologische Forschung, Band I, 1913, p. 19.Google Scholar

18 Cohen, Hermann: Die Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums, Leipzig 1919, p. 248, p. 266.Google Scholar

19 Kant, : Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Kirchmann, J. H. J.Leipzig 1870 pp. 211–212.Google Scholar

20 Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, ed. Von Kirchmann, J. H., Berlin 1869, 75, p. 175.Google Scholar

21 Kritik der praktischen Vermunft, ed. Vorländer, , Leipzig 1929, p. 174Google Scholar, Lewis White Beck's translation, New York 1956 p. 156. The above translation deviates from Beck's rendering of the sentence.