Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:51:41.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moralists and Gamesmen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

J. R. Lucas
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge

Extract

Professor Braithwaite’s inaugural lecture, here published in book form,1 is a trial run at a Platonic definition of the concept of dianemetic justice; or, as he himself would put it, a rational reconstruction of the concept “sensible-prudent-and-fair”. Aristotle left it that dianemetic justice was an equality and a matter of ratios. A just distribution of őoα µεριστ? τoς κoινωνoσι τς πoλιτείαѕ2 (Greek for “Co-operators’ Surplus”) was one in which each had an equitable share, no one having either more or less than he should. Professor Braithwaite goes further and replaces Aristotle’s ordered scale of the-more-and-the-less in which only imprecise and unhelpful answers could be given, by a numerical scale in which he can frame the question “Exactly how much is a fair share?” and propound his s own solution.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 R. B. Braithwaite: Theory of Games as a tool for the Moral Philosopher, C.U.P., 1955, pp. 75, 6s.

page 1 note 2 Nicomachean Ethics, Bk. V. 1130b32.

page 3 note 1 Von Neumann and Morgenstern: Theory of Games §§ 17:5—17:9, pp. 150- 162.

page 3 note 2 It is a competitive situation.

page 9 note 1 Matthew i:19.

page 10 note 1 I am indebted to Professor Braithwaite himself for drawing my attention to this.