Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:51:31.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Autonomy Still Refuted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

P. T. Geach
P. T. Geach
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 57 , Issue 219 , January 1982 , pp. 127 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Again the Logic of “Ought”’, Philosophy 52 (October 1977).

2 Thomas, Hurka, ‘Geach on Deriving Categorical “Oughts” ’, Philosophy 55 (January 1980).Google Scholar

3 W. D., Ross (ed.), Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics (Oxford University Press, 1957), 402.Google Scholar

4 ‘Moral Autonomy Fights Back’. Philosophy, 52 (October 1977)

5 Papers in Logic and Ethics (London: Duckworth, 1976), 95.

6 See e.g. Summa Theologica, la, II ae, q. 19 art. 6 ad 3um.