Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:11:02.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Limits of Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

N. Lossky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the beginning of this article I propose to use the word “ evolution “ as it is used in biology, to mean the formation of a number of vegetable or animal species out of a few comparatively simple types, and to exclude from its connotation any idea of perfection, purpose, value, and so on.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 2 , Issue 8 , October 1927 , pp. 492 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 492 note 1 By the word “ element” I merely mean a part which is simpler than the whole.

page 493 note 1 Spencer, H., The Principles of Psychology, vol. i, § 208.Google Scholar

page 493 note 2 Ibid. vol. ii, § 472.

page 493 note 3 By “ categories “ I mean the ultimate metaphysical conditions of the existence of nature which are, at the same time, the conditions of its being knowable in and through intellectual intuition.

page 494 note 1 Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Müller, Max, p. 153.Google Scholar

page 495 note 1 The term “ concretely-ideal “ will be explained later.

page 497 note 1 I use the word “ creative “ not in the narrow sense of producing a perfectly new content different in kind from the already existing types of being and requiring a new term to express it; by “ creative “ I mean in this connection the agent's power of producing a new event which may be exactly similar to events it had produced before.

page 497 note 2 See Meyerson, Identity and Reality.

page 499 note 1 Aristotelian Proceedings, 1924, Suppl., vol. iv, p. 112.Google Scholar

page 499 note 2 The Analysis of Mind, pp. 209, 307.

page 501 note 1 Becher, E., Die Fremddienliche Zweckmassigkeit der Pflanzengallen und die Hypothese eines über individuellen Scelischen (Leipzic, 1917).Google Scholar