Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:05:52.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Chinese Room the Real Thing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

David Anderson
David Anderson
Affiliation:
Teesside Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 62 , Issue 241 , July 1987 , pp. 389 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’ in Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3 (1980) reprinted in D. C., Dennett and D. R., Hofstadter (eds), The Mind's I (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1981), 353-373, for Searle's original objections to AI.Google Scholar

2 D. O., Walter, ‘The Thermostat and the Philosophy Professor’, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980), 449.Google Scholar

3 J. R., Searle, ‘The Myth of the Computer: An Exchange’, in New York Review of Books (24 July 1982), 4.Google Scholar