No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
A distinguished French scholar has recently set himself to delineate the history of Greek thought, from the time of Plato through the formation of the Hellenistic systems to the days of the empire, distinguishing two opposing tendencies, one towards pantheism and the other towards a philosophy of transcendence. But that distinction can be traced also in earlier periods than those with which Fr. Festugière is concerned, and it can be applied to theories of the soul equally with theories of God; this theme I hope to illustrate on a tiny scale in the early part of my paper, drawing attention to tendencies on the one hand to treat the soul as part of nature, on the other to place it outside nature. The former of these is the earlier.
page 99 note 2 Festugière, A. J., La Rivélation Hermès Trismégiste, esp. vol. ii, Le Dieu cosmique (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar
page 100 note 1 Cornford, F. M., Principium Sapientiae, ed. Guthrie, W. K. C. (Cambridge, 1952).Google Scholar
page 100 note 2 Aristotle, De An. I. 411 a 8; Met. A 984 a 16–27.
page 100 note 3 Fr. B 117 Diels.
page 100 note 4 Cf. Cornford, F. M. in Camb. Anc. Hist., vol. iv (1926), pp. 563–9Google Scholar; Jaeger, W., The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers (Oxford, 1947), Ch. viiiGoogle Scholar; Kranz, W., Empedokles (Zürich, 1949).Google Scholar
page 101 note 1 Odyssey, xi. 489–91.
page 101 note 2 Dodds, E. R., The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1951), Ch. ii.Google Scholar
page 101 note 3 Cornford, F. M., The Unwritten Philosophy, ed. Guthrie, W. K. C. (Cambridge, 1950), pp. 119–20.Google Scholar
page 102 note 1 Fr. B 8, vv. 42–45 Diels.
page 102 note 2 Comford, F. M. in C.A.H., vol. iv, pp. 558–62Google Scholar; Zafiropulo, J., L’École Éléate (Paris, 1950).Google Scholar
page 103 note 1 A. J. Festugière, op. cit., vol. ii, ch. v.
page 103 note 2 Rep. VII. 524D–531C.
page 103 note 3 Ti. 29C, etc.
page 104 note 1 Plato’s Cosmology (London, 1937), p. 39.Google Scholar
page 104 note 2 Phdr. 245C ff., 246E, 248A-E.
page 104 note 3 Cf. Jaeger, W., Aristotle (E. T., Oxford, 1934), ch. vi.Google Scholar
page 105 note 1 Jaeger, Aristotle, ch. iii.
page 105 note 2 Cf. esp. Frr. 21, 26, 27 Walzer. Cf. also Bignone, E., L’Aristotele perduto e La Fomazione filosofica di Epicuro (2 vols., Florence, 1936), vol. i, pp. 227–61.Google Scholar
page 106 note 1 Principium Sapientiae, ch. iii.
page 106 note 2 F. J. C. J. Nuyens, Ontwikkelingsmomenten in de Zielkunde van Aristoteles (Nijmegen-Utrecht, 1939); French translation, L’Evolution de la Psychologie d’Aristote (Louvain-Paris, 1948).Google Scholar
page 106 note 3 Ib., pp. 161–3 (French edn.).
page 108 note 1 Greek Science, vol. ii (London, 1949).Google Scholar
page 108 note 2 Basle, 1950 (Die Schule des Aristoteles, vol. v).
page 111 note 1 This sentence and the next require a good deal of qualification.