Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:09:36.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flew and the Revival of Social Darwinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

O. A. Ladimeji
Affiliation:
Clare College, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Eysenck, H. J., Race, Intelligence and Education, 1971, p. 46.Google Scholar

3 See DrSlater, Eliot, ‘Race, Sex and Equality’, in New Statesman, 6 04 1973Google Scholar; my critical letter, 13 April; Eysenck's reply 27 April. My reply to Eysenck was not accepted for publication.

4 Eysenck, , Race, Intelligence and Education, p. 150.Google Scholar

5 Barzun, J., Race: A Study in Superstition, 1965, p. 102.Google Scholar The dolichocephalics and the brachycephalics were long- and short-headed types; the aristocracy were assumed to be dolichocephalic while the people were brachycephalic and thus class polemics ranged under these terms.

6 Genetics and Man, 1966, p. 368.Google Scholar

7 Darlington, C. D., The Facts of Life, 1953, p. 297.Google Scholar

8 Op. cit., p. 403.

9 Op. cit., p. 292.

10 Encounter, 12 1971, p. 92.Google Scholar

11 Encounter, 12 1972, p. 85.Google Scholar