Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:09:51.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Even More Varieties of Retribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Nigel Walker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Professor Cottingham's article ‘Varieties of Retribution’ in the Philosophical Quarterly, 1979, 29, 238ff. is discussed, and new varieties of retributivism are outlined and criticised, particularly those proposed by Richard Burgh, Michael Moore and Robert Nozick. The ‘Kantian gap’ between moral censure and the obligation to punish is emphasised. Distinctions are drawn between theories which make punishment a duty and those which make it a right, and also between those based on the notion of a rule and those based on the expression of blame.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Philosophy , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , October 1999 , pp. 595 - 605
Copyright
© The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)