No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Those who are interested in Freud and psychoanalysis will be familiar with questions such as ‘Is Freudian psychology pseudo-scientific?’ ‘Is Freudian psychology falsifiable?’ ’Is unfalsifiability an adequate criterion of pseudo-science?’, and they might naturally suppose that it is these questions of which Erwin has attempted a ‘final accounting’. Surprisingly, these questions hardly feature in Erwin's book. Though at the outset Peter Medawar's notorious judgment that psychoanalysis is ‘the most stupendous intellectual confidence trick of the twentieth century’ is cited, Erwin does not seem to think it is part of his final accounting to say either whether he thinks it justified or, if not, why someone of Medawar's distinction should nevertheless have thought so.
1 Alasdair, Maclntyre, ‘Psychoanalysis: the Future of an Illusion’, Against the Self-images of the Age (London: Duckworth, 1976), p. 35.Google Scholar
2 Ernest, Gellner, The Psychoanalytic Movement (London: Paladin, 1985), p. 162.Google Scholar
3 Paul, Kline, Fact and Fantasy in Freudian Theory (London: Methuen, 1972), p. 94; 1981, p. 129.Google Scholar
4 William, JamesThe Principles of Psychology (New York: Dover, 1950), p. 555.Google Scholar
5 Allen, Esterson, Seductive Mirage (Chicago: Open Court, 1993).Google Scholar
6 Paul, Meehl, ‘Some Methodological Reflections on the Difficulties of Psychoanalytic Research,’ Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, 1970), p. 407.Google Scholar
7 Sigmund, Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams (London: Allen & Unwin, 1954), p. 191.Google Scholar
8 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3, (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 65.Google Scholar
9 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3, (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 557.Google Scholar
10 Richard, Wollheim, Freud (London: Fontana, 1992), pp. 88–91.Google Scholar
11 Skinner, B. F., ‘Critique of Psychoanalytic Concept and Theories’, The Validation of Scientific Theories, (edited by Phillip, Frank) (New York: Collier, 1959), p. 12.Google Scholar
12 Paul, Robinson, Freund & his Critics, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), p. 229.Google Scholar
13 Allen, Esterson, ‘Grünbaum's Tally Argument’, History of the Human Sciences, February, 1996.Google Scholar
14 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3 (London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 245.Google Scholar
15 Sigmund, Freud, Collected Papers, Vol. 3(London: Hogarth, 1925), p. 480.Google Scholar
16 Nagel, T., ‘Freud's Permanent Revolution’, New York Review of Books, (May 12, 1994).Google Scholar
17 Sigmund, Freud, Three Essays on Sexuality (London: Penguin, 1977), p. 112.Google Scholar
18 Sigmund, Freud, ‘The Psychoanalytic Movement’, Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (London: Hogarth, 1924), p. 300.Google Scholar
19 Sigmund, Freud, Autobiographical Study (London: Hogarth, 1950), p. 70.Google Scholar
20 Adolf, Grünbaum, ‘The Degeneration of Popper's Theory of Demarcation’, in Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins, (ed. by Fred, D'Agostino and Ian, Jarvie) (Boston, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1989).Google Scholar
21 Cioffi, F., ‘Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-science and Testability’, Popper and the Human Sciences (ed. by Currie, G. and Musgrave, A.), (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar
22 Griinbaum, A., Clinical Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis, (Madison, Connecticut: International Universities Press, Inc., 1993), p. 50.Google Scholar
23 Sigmund, Freud, Outline of Psychoanalysis (London: Hogarth, 1949), p. 56.Google Scholar
24 Cioffi, F., ‘“Exegetical Myth-Making” in Griinbaum's Indictment of Popper and Exoneration of Freud’, in Psychoanalysis and Theories of the Mind, (ed. by Crispin, Wright and Peter, Clark), (Blackwell, 1988). pp. 61–87.Google Scholar