Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:25:59.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cosmology and Infinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Pamela M. Huby
Pamela M. Huby
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mr Newton-Smith and Mr Boyce, in discussion notes in the January 1972 number of Philosophy, have raised a number of interesting points about my original paper. But I feel that they have not gone beyond a simple denial of the central argument, which is to be found on pp. 124–126 and 128–130 of the April 1971 number, and that much of what they say therefore fails by petitio.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 48 , Issue 184 , April 1973 , pp. 186 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Many others have interpreted the Third Man argument without having to take the line being considered here. Most handle the regress part gingerly.