Article contents
Compromise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Extract
Human conflict and its resolution is obviously a subject of great practical importance. Equally obviously, it is a vast subject, ranging from total war at one end of the spectrum to negotiated settlement at its other end. The literature on the subject is correspondingly vast and, in recent times, technical, thanks to the valuable contributions made to it by game theorists, economists, and writers on industrial and international relations. In this essay, however, I shall discuss only one familiar form of conflict-resolution. There is room for such a discussion, because philosophers have lately neglected compromise, despite the interest shown in it by the aforementioned experts, and despite the classic treatments of it by Halifax, Burke and Morley. Truly, ‘…compromise is not so widely discussed by philosophers as one might expect’, and ‘…the idea of compromise has been largely neglected by Anglo-American jurisprudence’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1989
References
1 Golding, M. P., ‘The Nature of Compromise: A Preliminary Inquiry’, Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics, Nomos, XXI, Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W. (eds) (New York University Press, 1979), 4.Google Scholar
2 Coons, J. E., ‘Compromise as Precise Justice’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 202.Google Scholar
3 Burke, E., ‘Speech on Moving the Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies’, The Works of Burke, II, Raffety, F. W. (ed.) (London: Oxford University Press, 1906), 226.Google Scholar
4 Burke, , op. cit., 173, 175, 232; emphases added.Google Scholar
5 Morley, J. (Viscount Morley), On Compromise, 2nd edn (London: Chap man and Hall, 1877), 1; emphases added.Google Scholar
6 Braybrooke, D., ‘The Possibilities of Compromise’, Ethics 93, No. 1 (10 1982), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 See the entries under ‘compromise’ in James, J. S., Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, 4th edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1972)Google Scholar; Saunders, J. B., Words and Phrases Legally Defined, 2nd edn (London: Butterworths, 1969)Google Scholar; Dictionary of Politics and Economics, 2nd edn (Berlin: 1976).Google Scholar
8 Raffety, , op. cit., xi–xii.Google Scholar
9 Braybrooke, , op. cit., 141.Google Scholar
10 Benditt, T. M. ‘Compromising Interests and Principles’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 30.Google Scholar
11 Golding, , op. cit., 13.Google Scholar
12 Bodenheimer, E., ‘Compromise in the Realization of Ideas and Values’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 142, 157.Google Scholar
13 Hart, H. L. A., Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
14 Savile, G. (Marquis of Halifax), The Character of a Trimmer, The Complete Works of G. Savile, Raleigh, W. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912), 48.Google Scholar
15 Shapiro, M., ‘Compromise and Litigation’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 164; emphases added.Google Scholar
16 Shapiro, , op. cit., 173–174.Google Scholar
17 Woodward, E. L., History of England (London: Methuen, 1947), 152–154.Google Scholar
18 Carens, J. H., ‘Compromises in Politics’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 126.Google Scholar
19 Carens, , op. cit., 140.Google Scholar
20 Carens, , op. cit., 126–128.Google Scholar
21 Carens, , op. cit., 130.Google Scholar
22 Shapiro, , op. cit., 171.Google Scholar
23 Kuflik, A., ‘Morality and Compromise’Google Scholar, in Pennock, and Chapman, , op. cit., 63; emphases added.Google Scholar
24 Carens, , op. cit., 139.Google Scholar
25 Broad, C. D., ‘Ought We to Fight for our Country in the Next War?’, Ethics and the History of Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952), 235–236Google Scholar; Ross, W. D., Foundations of Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939), 315.Google Scholar
26 Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism (1863)Google Scholar; Urmson, J. O., ‘The Interpretation of the Philosophy of J. S. Mill’, Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 MacCormick, D. N., ‘The Obligation of Reparation’, Aristotelian Society Proceedings 78 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Austin, J. L., ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Philosophical Papers, Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J. (eds) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 134.Google Scholar
29 Golding, , op. cit., 7–8.Google Scholar
30 Kant, I., Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785).Google Scholar
31 Birley, R. (ed.), Speeches and Documents in American History, II, 1818–1865 (London: Oxford University Press, 1964), 140.Google Scholar
32 Birley, , op. cit., 32.Google Scholar
33 Nevins, A. and Commager, H. S., A Short History of the United States (New York: Random House, 1945), 219.Google Scholar
34 Birley, , op. cit., 66–80.Google Scholar
35 Birley, , op. cit., 188–192.Google Scholar
36 Birley, , op. cit., 183–187.Google Scholar
37 See e.g. Barry, B., ‘Justice as Reciprocity’, Justice, Kamenka, E. and Tay, A. E. (eds) (London: Arnold, 1979), 50–78.Google Scholar
38 Mill, J. S., On Liberty (1859), Ch. 5.Google Scholar
39 Birley, , op. cit., 77.Google Scholar
40 Birley, , op. cit., 182Google Scholar; cf. 78.
41 Nevins, and Commager, , op. cit., 220.Google Scholar
42 Birley, , op. cit., 217.Google Scholar
43 Birley, , op. cit., 241, 202; emphases added.Google Scholar
44 Nevins, and Commager, , op. cit., 225.Google Scholar
45 Nevins, and Commager, , op. cit., 220.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by