Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T10:57:12.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Border Anxiety: Culture, Identity and Belonging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Brenda Almond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the ethical choices confronting European countries in relation to what has been described as border anxiety. Last year over a million migrants and asylum-seekers crossed European Union borders and the flow has shown no sign of diminishing. This unprecedented movement of people has attracted two main responses. A core issue for both is the Schengen principle of open borders and opinion is split between those who believe that the sheer weight of numbers of would-be migrants requires the reintroduction of strictly controlled frontiers, and those who demand a prompt and sympathetic response to the plight of refugees from war-torn countries. These two positions, however, do not constitute the sum of the moral debate. A broader appraisal of the issues must take account of matters of culture and identity, partiality and preference, and also of some rather more arcane questions about the ethics of ownership, the notion of belonging, and the legitimacy of preferring your ‘own’, whether at a global, national, or personal level. The complexity of this debate and its internal paradoxes throw light on some contemporary concerns about the threat the current situation may pose to Europe's own historic culture and identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 463 - 481
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In relation, for example, to schools, Government figures published in 2014 estimated that 88,000 extra school places would be needed in schools in England by 2023.

2 The Times (London, April 2, 2016).

3 Ehrlich, Paul, The Population Bomb (New York, Ballantyne Books, 1969; revised edn. New York, Rivercity Books, 1975)Google ScholarPubMed.

4 Thomas Malthus, Essay on the Principle of Population (1798, rev.1803).

5 While the figure for the United Kingdom, as reported by its Office of National Statistics, is 1.5, it is lower still in Austria, Spain and Italy. Most women in Spain, and also in Italy, have only one child and the United Nations forecasts a drop of a third in the Italian population by 2050 if reproductive trends continue at the current level. Germany's population, too, is predicted to fall from 82 million (2005) to 70 million by the mid-twenty-first century according to Germany's Federal Institute for Demographic Research. Russia also confronts a situation of population decline: Russian women have an average of only 1.2 children and the death rate in Russia is nearly double the birth rate.

6 Existing immigration practice and policy in the United Kingdom means that the British population will increase by just over 5 million by 2025 and continue to grow till 2040 (Office for National Statistics), most of the increase being due to migration of dependents and spouses of immigrants who have already settled there. Figures for families with three or more children in the UK are: Bangladeshis, 60%, Pakistanis 54 %, Indian, 30%, Chinese, 24%, Caribbean, 22%. The figure for the native population (officially described as ‘white British’ and including the English, Scots and Welsh) with three or more children is less than one in five.

7 Rowthorn, Robert, ‘Numbers and National Identity,’ in Disney, H., ed. Migration, Integration and the European Labour Market (London, Civitas, 2003, 65–81)Google Scholar. See also UN: Population Division of the Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘Replacement Migration: is it a solution to declining and aging populations?’ (New York: United Nations, 2000)Google Scholar.

8 Immigration figures from the Centre for Immigration Studies (New York, December 2005)Google ScholarPubMed. Current numbers from CIS: Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler, 61 Million Immigrants and Their Young Children Now Live in the United States (March 2016).

9 Arnold, Matthew, Culture and Anarchy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960)Google Scholar, 70. (First pub. 1869)

10 Tony Blair, (London, Sunday Times, 27.03.2016), 22.

11 Rowthorn, op. cit. note 7, 76.

12 Glenny, Misha, The Balkans 1804–1999 Nationalism, War and the Great Powers (London: Granta Books, 1999. xxii)Google Scholar.

13 For Ferguson's views on shifting global movements, see Ferguson, Niall, Empire: The Rise and Fall of British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power (New York: Basic Books, 2003)Google Scholar and Colossus: the Rise and Fall of the American Empire (London: Penguin, 2004)Google Scholar.

14 Buchanan, Patrick, The Death of the West (St. Martin's Press, New York, 2002), 12Google Scholar.

15 I defend this point of view in ‘Against irrationalism’ in Ethik, Vernunft und Rationalitaet/Ethics, Reason and Rationality (ed.) Bondolfi, Alberto (Munster, Lit Verlag, 1997) 91–104 Google Scholar, a shortened version of my article ‘Philosophy and the cult of irrationalism’ in The Impulse to Philosophise (ed.) Griffiths, A. Phillips (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Blum, Lawrence, ‘Against deriving particularity’ in Hooker, B. and Little, Margaret (eds) Moral Particularism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 205–226 Google Scholar.

17 Ibid., 206.

18 Adam Smith, The Theory of the Moral Sentiments (1759). Part VI, Ch. III.

19 Hare, R.M., Essays in Ethical Theory (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1989) 216Google Scholar.

20 Hare, R.M., ‘Universalisability’ (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55, 1954–55)Google Scholar.

21 See Hare, R.M. ‘Utilitarianism and the Vicarious Affects’ in Essays in Ethical Theory (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1989), 231–244 Google Scholar.

22 Hare, R. M., ‘Could Kant have been a utilitarian?’ in Sorting Out Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 147–165 Google Scholar.

23 Rowthorn, op. cit., 73.

24 Nagel, Thomas, Equality and Partiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 10Google Scholar.

25 Gomberg, Paul, ‘Patriotism is like Racism’, Ethics 101 (1990), 144–50, 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Ed Conway, Times Newspaper (London, 26.01.16).

27 Times Newspaper (London, 27.12.15).

28 I should like to express my thanks to Jovan Babic and other participants in the conference on ‘Borders and Frontiers – Space(s) of Life and Causes for Conflicts and Wars’ organised by ILECS (International Law and Ethics Conference Series) at the University of Belgrade, Serbia, for their helpful and stimulating discussion of this paper and the issues raised.