No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
In his article on “The Nature and the Status of the Study of Politics”1 Professor White raises, whether explicitly or by implication, some of the most important and, probably permanent problems of the subject. The solutions that he attempts to provide seem to me, however, to be less satisfying than might be expected.
page 221 note 1 Philosophy, Oct. 1950, pp. 291–300.
page 221 note 2 Loc. cit., p. 292.
page 222 note 1 Loc. cit., p. 294 n.
page 222 note 2 Loc. cit., p. 294.
page 222 note 3 Loc. cit., p. 295.
page 222 note 4 Loc. cit., p. 295.
page 223 note 1 See above.
page 223 note 2 My italics.
page 223 note 3 Loc. cit., p. 296.
page 223 note 4 My italics.
page 223 note 5 Loc. cit., p. 300.
page 224 note 1 Notably his Trahison des Clercs.
page 224 note 2 In his introduction to Hobbes's, Leviathan, Oxford, 1946.Google Scholar
page 226 note 1 See Sir Ernest Barker, Introduction to his Translation of Gierke, O., Natural Law and the Theory of Society, Cambridge, 1934.Google Scholar
page 227 note 1 Quoted in Martin, B. K., The Triumph of Lord Palmerston, London, 1924.Google Scholar