Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:21:06.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevance of Whitehead1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Errol Harris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 40 , Issue 151 , January 1965 , pp. 60 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 60 note 2 Bertrand, Russell, My Philosophical Development (London, 1959), p. 12.Google Scholar

page 61 note 1 Critique of Pure Reason, B 878 (Kemp-Smith's translation).Google Scholar

page 61 note 2 Cf. Max, Horkheimer, The Eclipse of Reason (O.U.P., 1947), and my ‘Objectivity and Reason’ in this Journal, Vol. 31, 1956.Google Scholar

page 63 note 1 Process and Reality, pp. 30-31.Google Scholar

page 64 note 1 Vide, Physics and Philosophy (London, 1959), pp. 60–68.Google Scholar

page 64 note 2 ‘Our Conception of Matter’ in What is Life and Other Scientific Essays (New York, 1956), p. 177.Google Scholar

page 64 note 3 Leclerc, , in his paper on ‘Form and Actuality’ in the volume under review (p. 171), makes brief reference to this concurrence.Google Scholar

page 66 note 1 Vide, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958), Chs. I and II.Google Scholar