Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:28:52.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inspecting Images: A Reply to Smythies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Smythies, John R., ‘On Inspecting Images’, Philosophy, 64, No. 248 (04 1989), 252254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Wright, Edmond, ‘Inspecting Images’, Philosophy, 58 (1983), 5772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Dennett, Daniel C., Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Gram, Moltke S., Direct Realism: A Study of Perception (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hacker, P. M. S., Appearance and Reality: A Philosophical Investigation into Perception and Perceptual Qualities (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987)Google Scholar; Kelley, David, The Evidence of the Senses: A Realist Theory of Perception (Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Matthen, Mohan, ‘Biological Functions and Perceptual Content’, Journal of Philosophy, 85, No. 1 (01, 1988), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Hunter, J. F. M., ‘Seeing Dimensionally’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17, No. 3 (1987), 553566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 P. M. S. Hacker, op. cit. (See footnote 3).

6 Collins, Arthur W., ‘The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Perception’, Philosophical Review, 76 (1968), 436459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Wright, Edmond, ‘A Defence of Sellars’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 46, No. 1 (1986), 7390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Wright, Edmond, ‘A Design for a Human Mind’, Conceptus, 47 (Winter, 1985), 2137.Google Scholar

9 Madell, Geoffey, Mind and Materialism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

10 Maund, J. B., ‘The Representative Theory of Perception’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5 (1975), 4155CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 13 (1976), 5762Google Scholar; ‘On the Distinction between Perceptual and Ordinary Beliefs’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 37 (1977), 209219.Google Scholar

11 For a recent argument that physicalism is compatible with the phenomena of subjectivity see Levin, Janet, ‘Physicalism and the Subjectivity of Secondary Qualities’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65, No. 4 (12, 1987), 400411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 See Finke, Ronald A., Pinker, Steven and Farah, Martha J., ‘Reinterpreting Visual Patterns in Mental Imagery’, Cognitive Science, 13, No. 1 (0103, 1989), 5178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Laudan, Rachel and Laudan, Larry, ‘Dominance and the Disunity of Method’, Philosophy of Science, 56, No. 2 (06 1989), 221237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Smythies, J. R., Analysis of Perception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956)Google Scholar; see also ‘The Representative Theory of Perception’, in Smythies, J. R. (ed.), Brain and Mind: Modern Concepts of the Nature of Mind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), 241257Google Scholar; The Geometry of Mind (forthcoming).Google Scholar