No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
1 Smythies, John R., ‘On Inspecting Images’, Philosophy, 64, No. 248 (04 1989), 252–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Wright, Edmond, ‘Inspecting Images’, Philosophy, 58 (1983), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Dennett, Daniel C., Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Gram, Moltke S., Direct Realism: A Study of Perception (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hacker, P. M. S., Appearance and Reality: A Philosophical Investigation into Perception and Perceptual Qualities (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987)Google Scholar; Kelley, David, The Evidence of the Senses: A Realist Theory of Perception (Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Matthen, Mohan, ‘Biological Functions and Perceptual Content’, Journal of Philosophy, 85, No. 1 (01, 1988), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Hunter, J. F. M., ‘Seeing Dimensionally’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17, No. 3 (1987), 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 P. M. S. Hacker, op. cit. (See footnote 3).
6 Collins, Arthur W., ‘The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Perception’, Philosophical Review, 76 (1968), 436–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Wright, Edmond, ‘A Defence of Sellars’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 46, No. 1 (1986), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Wright, Edmond, ‘A Design for a Human Mind’, Conceptus, 47 (Winter, 1985), 21–37.Google Scholar
9 Madell, Geoffey, Mind and Materialism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
10 Maund, J. B., ‘The Representative Theory of Perception’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5 (1975), 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 13 (1976), 57–62Google Scholar; ‘On the Distinction between Perceptual and Ordinary Beliefs’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 37 (1977), 209–219.Google Scholar
11 For a recent argument that physicalism is compatible with the phenomena of subjectivity see Levin, Janet, ‘Physicalism and the Subjectivity of Secondary Qualities’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65, No. 4 (12, 1987), 400–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 See Finke, Ronald A., Pinker, Steven and Farah, Martha J., ‘Reinterpreting Visual Patterns in Mental Imagery’, Cognitive Science, 13, No. 1 (01–03, 1989), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Laudan, Rachel and Laudan, Larry, ‘Dominance and the Disunity of Method’, Philosophy of Science, 56, No. 2 (06 1989), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Smythies, J. R., Analysis of Perception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956)Google Scholar; see also ‘The Representative Theory of Perception’, in Smythies, J. R. (ed.), Brain and Mind: Modern Concepts of the Nature of Mind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), 241–257Google Scholar; The Geometry of Mind (forthcoming).Google Scholar