Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:36:46.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desert, Equality and Injustice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Les Holborow
Les Holborow
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (Oxford, 1972) is an extremely long and elaborate work. But despite the length and the elaboration there is at the heart of the work a crucial set of unargued assumptions which need to be challenged. When this is done we are in a position to provide additional support for the critical conclusions of several other commentators who concentrate on other features of Rawls's system.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 192 , April 1975 , pp. 157 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, Brian (1), ‘Liberalism and Want-Satisfaction’, Political Theory, 1 (2), 05 1973.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (2), The Liberal Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., ‘Rawls' A Theory of Justice—I’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 23 (91), 04 1973.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘Rawls on Justice’, The Philosophical Review, LXXXII (2), 04 1973.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar