Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:59:41.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Augustine and Ibn Sina on Souls in the Afterlife

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Abstract

This paper examines significant similarities between the views of Augustine and Ibn Sina on the soul's knowledge of itself. But there is also an intriguing difference. Ibn Sina wanted to be able to supply a satisfying account of the individuation of souls in the afterlife but was unable to provide it. Augustine, by contrast, though seemingly not especially interested in supplying any such account, nevertheless attributed to separated souls a desire to return to their very own bodies, which suggests a way of developing such an account.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sorabji, Richard, Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, (Oxford: Clardendon Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Sorabji Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, 226

3 Sorabji Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, 6

4 Ibid., 6

5 Ibid., 37

6 Sorabji Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, 218

7 On The Trinity (De Trinitate), McKenna, Stephen (trans.), Matthews, G.B. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002): 10.10.16Google Scholar

8 Sorabji Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, 124

9 Sina, Ibn, Liber De Anima, Avicenna Latinus, Van Riet, S. (ed.), Leiden: E.J.Brill, (1968): 5.3; Sorabji 2006: 134–35Google Scholar

10 Augustine, City of God (trans.) Dods, Marcus, Schaff, Philip (ed.), vol. II (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993): 13.23Google Scholar

11 Ibid. 22.14

12 Ibid

13 Ibid. 22.20

14 Ibid. 13.20