No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
We often, in effect, take it for granted that some word or phrase is what is called ‘the name of a class, be that class empty or non-empty’. We do so whenever in effect we either wonder about, or mean to be taking a view on, the number of members a certain suppositious class has, on the ultrasimple number scale: ‘None, more than none’.
1 A shorter version of this article was read in 1978 to the Minnesota Philosophical Society and to the Philosophy Colloquium of the University of Miami.