Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T09:12:45.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Philosophical Theories of Evidence Are (and Ought To Be) Ignored by Scientists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Achinstein
Peter Achinstein*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, 347 Gilman Hall, 3400 N. Charles St., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218–6848.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are two reasons, I claim, scientists do and should ignore standard philosophical theories of objective evidence: (1) Such theories propose concepts that are far too weak to give scientists what they want from evidence, viz., a good reason to believe a hypothesis; and (2) They provide concepts that make the evidential relationship a priori, whereas typically establishing an evidential claim requires empirical investigation.

Type
Experiment and Conceptual Change
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S180 - S192
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, Peter (1985), The Nature of Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Achinstein, Peter. (2001), The Book of Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchwald, Jed (1994), The Creation of Scientific Effects. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1962), Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Glymour, Clark (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, Heinrich (1896), Miscellaneous Papers. London.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1897), “Cathode Rays”, Philosophical Magazine 44, 293–316.Google Scholar
Weiner, Steve, Xu, Q., Goldberg, P., Liu, J., and Bar-Yossef, O. (1998), “Evidence for the Use of Fire at Jhoukoudian, China”, Science 281, 251–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed