Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:05:54.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is ‘The Problem of the Direction of Time’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Craig Callender
Craig Callender*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
*
†Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, The London School of Economics, Houghton St., London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper searches for an explicit expression of the so-called problem of the direction of time. I argue that the traditional version of the problem is an artifact of a mistaken view in the foundations of statistical mechanics, and that to the degree it is a problem, it is really one general to all the special sciences. I then search the residue of the traditional problem for any remaining difficulty particular to time's arrow and find that there is a special puzzle for some types of scientific realist.

Type
Symposium: New Work on Time's Arrow
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S223 - S234
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to dedicate this paper to the memory of my former Ph.D. supervisor, Robert Weingard, a great philosopher and friend. I would also like to thank Shelly Goldstein, Huw Price, and the audience at the annual meeting of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science (Sheffield, UK, 1996) for useful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Albert, D. (1996), “On the Character of Statistical-Mechanical Probabilities”, oral presentation, PSA96, Cleveland, OH, November 3, 1996.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (1995), “The Metaphysics of Time Reversal: Hutchison on Classical Mechanics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 331–340.10.1093/bjps/46.3.331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. (1996), Explaining Time's Arrow. Thesis submitted for Ph.D., Rutgers University. Friedman, M. (1974), “Explanation and Scientific Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. (1986). “Initial Conditions”, in Kolb, E.W. et al. (eds.), E.W. Kolb et al., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 467–477.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, J. (1993), “Boltzmann's Entropy and Time's Arrow”, Physics Today Sept: 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (1996), Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, L. (1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoppard, T. (1993), Arcadia. London: Faber and Faber.CrossRefGoogle Scholar