Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:44:12.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Do Brain Data Really Show?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Valerie Gray Hardcastle  and
C. Matthew Stewart
Valerie Gray Hardcastle*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
C. Matthew Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston
*
For reprints, contact Valerie Gray Hardcastle, STS/CIS, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061–0227, USA, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a bias in neuroscience toward localizing and modularizing brain functions. Single cell recording, imaging studies, and the study of neurological deficits all feed into the Gallian view that different brain areas do different things and the things being done are confined to particular processing streams. At the same time, there is a growing sentiment that brains probably don't work like that after all; it is better to conceive of them as fundamentally distributed units, multi-tasking at every level. This sentiment, however, is much less congenial to the tried-and-true experimental protocols available today and to theorizing about the brain in general. This essay examines the tension between current experimental methods and large-scale views of the brain. We argue that this disconnection between experiment and what really are guiding theoretical metaphors seriously impedes progress in neuroscience.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue S3 , September 2002 , pp. S72 - S82
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baarsma, E. A., and Collewjin, H. (1975), “Changes in Compensatory Eye Movements after Unilateral Labyrinthectomy in the Rabbit”, Changes in Compensatory Eye Movements after Unilateral Labyrinthectomy in the Rabbit 211:219–230.Google ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, W. (2000), “From Imaging to Believing: Epistemic Issues in Generating Biological Data”, in Creath, R. and Maienschein, J. (eds.), Epistemology and Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 138–163.Google Scholar
Buller, D., and Hardcastle, V. G (2001), “Evolutionary Psychology, Meet the Developing Brain: Combating Promiscuous Modularity”, Evolutionary Psychology, Meet the Developing Brain: Combating Promiscuous Modularity 1:307–325.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (1999), “DeFreuding Evolutionary Psychology: Adaptation and Human Motivation”, in Hardcastle, V. G. (ed.), Where Philosophy Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 99–114.Google Scholar
Cabeza, R., and Nyberg, L. (1997), “Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects”, Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects 9:1–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Cabeza, R., and Nyberg, L. (2000),“Imagining and Cognition II; An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies”, Imagining and Cognition II; An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies 12:1–47.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., and Reichle, E. D. (2000), “Working Memory and Executive Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging”, Working Memory and Executive Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging 10:195–199.Google ScholarPubMed
Ceballos-Baumann, A. O., Passingham, R. E, Warner, T., Playford, E. D., Marsden, C. D., and Brooks, D. J. (1995), “Overactive Prefrontal and Underactive Motor Cortical Areas in Idiopathic Dystonia”, Overactive Prefrontal and Underactive Motor Cortical Areas in Idiopathic Dystonia 37:363–372.Google ScholarPubMed
Churchland, P. S., and Sejnowski, T. J (1988), “Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience”, Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience 242:741–745.Google ScholarPubMed
Colebatch, J. G., Deiber, M. P., Passingham, R. E., Friston, K. J., and Frackowiak, R. S. (1991), “Regional Cerebral Blood Flow During Voluntary Arm and Hand Movements in Human Subjects”, Regional Cerebral Blood Flow During Voluntary Arm and Hand Movements in Human Subjects 65:1392–1401.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. S. (1996), “Discovering the Functional Mesh: On the Methods of Evolutionary Psychology”, Discovering the Functional Mesh: On the Methods of Evolutionary Psychology 6:559–585.Google Scholar
Davies, P. S. (1999), “The Conflict of Evolutionary Psychology”, in Hardcastle, V. G. (ed.), Where Philosophy Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 67–81.Google Scholar
Davies, P. S., Fetzer, J., and Foster, T. (1995), “Logical Reasoning and Domain Specificity: A Critique of the Social Exchange Theory of Reasoning”, Logical Reasoning and Domain Specificity: A Critique of the Social Exchange Theory of Reasoning 10:1–38.Google Scholar
De Gelder, B. (2000), “More to Seeing than Meets the Eye”, More to Seeing than Meets the Eye 289:1148–1149.Google ScholarPubMed
Derbyshire, S. W., Jones, A. K., Devani, P., Friston, K. J., Feinmann, C., Harris, M., Pearce, S., Watson, J. D., and Frackowiak, R. S. (1994), “Cerebral Responses to Pain in Patients with Atypical Facial Pain Measured by Positron Emission Tomography”, Cerebral Responses to Pain in Patients with Atypical Facial Pain Measured by Positron Emission Tomography 57:1166–1172.Google ScholarPubMed
DeYoe, E. A., and van Essen, D.C. (1988), “Concurrent Processing Streams in Monkey Visual Cortex”, Concurrent Processing Streams in Monkey Visual Cortex 11:219–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Emiliano, M., Frith, C. D., and Driver, J. (2000), “Modulation of Human Visual Cortex by Crossmodal Spatial Attention”, Modulation of Human Visual Cortex by Crossmodal Spatial Attention 289:1206–1208.Google Scholar
George, M. S., Ketter, T. A., Gill, D. S., Haxby, J. V, Ungerleider, L. G., Herscovitch, P., and Post, R. M. (1993), “Brain Regions Involved in Recognizing Facial Emotion or Identity: An Oxygen-15 PET Study”, Brain Regions Involved in Recognizing Facial Emotion or Identity: An Oxygen-15 PET Study 5:384–394.Google ScholarPubMed
Gold, J. M. (1995), “PET Validation of a Novel Prefrontal Task: Delayed Response Alternation”, PET Validation of a Novel Prefrontal Task: Delayed Response Alternation 10:3–10.Google Scholar
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1996), “The Prefrontal Landscape: Implications of Functional Architecture for Understanding Human Mentation and the Central Executive”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B) 351:1445–1453.Google ScholarPubMed
Grantham, T., and Nichols, S. (1999), “Evolutionary Psychology: Ultimate Explanations and Panglossian Predictions”, in Hardcastle, V. G. (ed.), Where Philosophy Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 47–66.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (1997), What Emotions Really Are. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulyas, B., and Roland, P. E. (1994), “Binocular Disparity Discrimination in Human Cerebral Cortex: Functional Anatomy by Positron Emission Tomography”, Binocular Disparity Discrimination in Human Cerebral Cortex: Functional Anatomy by Positron Emission Tomography 91:1239–1243.Google ScholarPubMed
Hardcastle, V. G. (1999), The Myth of Pain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, V. G., and Stewart, C. M. (2001), “The Structure of Neuroscientific Theories”, in Machamer, P., Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.) Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 30–44.Google Scholar
Hsieh, J. C., Hagermark, O., Stahle-Backdahl, M., Ericson, K., Eriksson, L., Stone-Elander, S., and Ingvar, M. (1994), “Urge to Scratch Represented in the Human Cerebral Cortex during Itch”, Urge to Scratch Represented in the Human Cerebral Cortex during Itch 72:3004–3008.Google ScholarPubMed
Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Koeppe, R. A., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., and Mintun, M. A. (1993), “Spatial Working Memory in Humans as Revealed by PET”, Spatial Working Memory in Humans as Revealed by PET 363:623–625.Google ScholarPubMed
Livingstone, M., and Hubel, D. (1988), “Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth: Anatomy, Physiology, and Perception”, Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth: Anatomy, Physiology, and Perception 240:740–749.Google ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, D. (2000), “Terra cognita: From Functional Neuroimaging to the Map of the Mind”, Terra cognita: From Functional Neuroimaging to the Map of the Mind 1:93–116.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (1996), “Neural Correlates of Category-specific Knowledge”, Neural Correlates of Category-specific Knowledge 379:649–652.Google ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, A. R. (1999), “Mapping Cognition to the Brain through Neural Interactions”, Mapping Cognition to the Brain through Neural Interactions 7:523–548.Google ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, A. R. (2000), “Towards a Network Theory of Cognition”, Towards a Network Theory of Cognition 13:861–870.Google ScholarPubMed
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., and Macko, K. A. (1983), “Object Vision and Spatial Vision: Two Cortical Pathways”, Object Vision and Spatial Vision: Two Cortical Pathways 6:414–417.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. D., and Perachio, A. A. (1990a), “Compensation of Horizontal Canal Related Activity in the Medial Vestibular Nucleus following Unilateral Labyrinth Ablation in the Decerebrate Gerbil: I. Type I Neurons”, Compensation of Horizontal Canal Related Activity in the Medial Vestibular Nucleus following Unilateral Labyrinth Ablation in the Decerebrate Gerbil: I. Type I Neurons 82:359–372.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. D., and Perachio, A. A. (1990b), “Compensation of Horizontal Canal Related Activity in the Medial Vestibular Nucleus following Unilateral Labyrinth Ablation in the Decerebrate Gerbil: I. Type II Neurons”, Compensation of Horizontal Canal Related Activity in the Medial Vestibular Nucleus following Unilateral Labyrinth Ablation in the Decerebrate Gerbil: I. Type II Neurons 82:373–384.Google Scholar
Rauch, S. L. (2001), “A PET Investigation of Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning”, A PET Investigation of Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning 3:271–286.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. (1996), “The Prospects for an Evolutionary Psychology: Human Language and Human Rationality”, The Prospects for an Evolutionary Psychology: Human Language and Human Rationality 6:541–557.Google Scholar
Sergent, J., Ohta, S., and MacDonald, B. (1992), “Functional Neuroanatomy of Face and Object Processing. A Positron Emission Tomography Study”, Functional Neuroanatomy of Face and Object Processing. A Positron Emission Tomography Study 1:15–36.Google Scholar
Sergent, J., Zuck, E., Terriah, S., and MacDonald, B. (1992), “Distributed Neural Network Underlying Musical Sight-reading and Keyboard Performance”, Distributed Neural Network Underlying Musical Sight-reading and Keyboard Performance 257:106–109.Google ScholarPubMed
Shaefer, K.-P., and Meyer, D. L. (1974), “Compensation of Vestibular Lesions”, in Kornhuber, H. H. (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. Vi/2. New York: Plenum, 462–490.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (1998), “Do’s and Don’ts for Darwinizing Psychology”, in Allen, C. and Cummins, D. (eds.) The Evolution of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 243–259.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (1999), “Presence of Mind”, in Hardcastle, V. G. (ed.), Where Philosophy Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 83–98.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L., and Epstein, W. (1998), “Evolutionary Theory Meets Cognitive Psychology: A More Selective Perspective”, Evolutionary Theory Meets Cognitive Psychology: A More Selective Perspective 13:171–194.Google Scholar
Shulman, R. G. (1996), “Interview with Robert G. Shulman”, Interview with Robert G. Shulman 8:474–480.Google Scholar
Sirkin, D. W., Precht, W., and Courjon, J. H. (1984), “Initial, Rapid Phase of Recovery from Unilateral Vestibular Lesion in Rat not Dependent on Survival of Central Portion of Vestibular Nerve”, Initial, Rapid Phase of Recovery from Unilateral Vestibular Lesion in Rat not Dependent on Survival of Central Portion of Vestibular Nerve 302:245–256.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1997), “Is the Mind an Adaptation for Coping with Environmental Complexity?”, Is the Mind an Adaptation for Coping with Environmental Complexity? 12:539–550.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (1995), “The Adapted Mind”, The Adapted Mind 10:365–380.Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, R. S., and Bechtel, W. (1997), “PET: Exploring the Myth and the Method”, PET: Exploring the Myth and the Method 64 (Supplement): S95–106.Google Scholar
Wandell, B. A. (1999), “Computational Neuroimaging of Human Visual Cortex”, Computational Neuroimaging of Human Visual Cortex 22:145–173.Google ScholarPubMed
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., and Gjedde, A. (1992), “Lateralization of Phonetic and Pitch Discrimination in Speech Processing”, Lateralization of Phonetic and Pitch Discrimination in Speech Processing 256:846–849.Google ScholarPubMed