Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Darden, Lindley
and
Craver, Carl F
2009.
Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.
2011.
The Philosophy of Evidence‐Based Medicine.
p.
193.
DesAutels, Lane
2011.
Against Regular and Irregular Characterizations of Mechanisms.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 5,
p.
914.
Moss, Lenny
2012.
Is the philosophy of mechanism philosophy enough?.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Nathan, Marco J.
2012.
The Varieties of Molecular Explanation.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 79,
Issue. 2,
p.
233.
Andersen, Holly
2012.
The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation.
Synthese,
Vol. 189,
Issue. 3,
p.
415.
Soom, Patrice
2012.
Mechanisms, determination and the metaphysics of neuroscience.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
655.
Nicholson, Daniel J.
2012.
The concept of mechanism in biology.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
152.
Illari, Phyllis McKay
and
Williamson, Jon
2012.
What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Wright, Cory D.
2012.
Mechanistic explanation without the ontic conception.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
375.
Houng, Allen Y.
2012.
Levels of analysis: philosophical issues.
WIREs Cognitive Science,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 3,
p.
315.
Blasimme, Alessandro
Maugeri, Paolo
and
Germain, Pierre-Luc
2013.
What mechanisms can’t do: Explanatory frameworks and the function of the p53 gene in molecular oncology.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 3,
p.
374.
Boniolo, Giovanni
2013.
On Molecular Mechanisms and Contexts of Physical Explanation.
Biological Theory,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
256.
Illari, Phyllis
and
Williamson, Jon
2013.
In Defence of Activities.
Journal for General Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 1,
p.
69.
van Mil, Marc H. W.
Boerwinkel, Dirk Jan
and
Waarlo, Arend Jan
2013.
Modelling Molecular Mechanisms: A Framework of Scientific Reasoning to Construct Molecular-Level Explanations for Cellular Behaviour.
Science & Education,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
93.
Gebharter, Alexander
and
Kaiser, Marie I.
2014.
Explanation in the Special Sciences.
Vol. 367,
Issue. ,
p.
55.
Pöyhönen, Samuli
2014.
Intentional concepts in cognitive neuroscience.
Philosophical Explorations,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
93.
Levy, Arnon
2014.
What was Hodgkin and Huxley’s Achievement?.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
469.
Kuhlmann, Meinard
and
Glennan, Stuart
2014.
On the relation between quantum mechanical and neo-mechanistic ontologies and explanatory strategies.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
337.
Thörne, Karin
and
Gericke, Niklas
2014.
Teaching Genetics in Secondary Classrooms: a Linguistic Analysis of Teachers’ Talk About Proteins.
Research in Science Education,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 1,
p.
81.