Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:51:36.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Test Cases, Resolvability, and Group Selection: A Critical Examination of the Myxoma Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robert A. Wilson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolution of the myxoma virus in Australia has been presented for many years as a test case for the hypothesis that group selection can function effectively ‘in the wild.’ This paper critically examines the myxoma case, and argues that its failure as a test case for this hypothesis has broader implications for debates over the levels of selection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 380 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank audiences at the University of Alberta and at the 2002 meetings of Western Canadian Philosophical Association held in Calgary, as well as two referees for the journal, for their constructive feedback on earlier versions of this paper. The work presented here was written with the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

Alexander, Richard, and Borgia, Garcia (1978), “Group Selection, Altruism, and the Levels of Organization of Life”, Group Selection, Altruism, and the Levels of Organization of Life 9:449–474.Google Scholar
Bourke, Andrew F.G., and Franks, Nigel R. (1995), Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, Ross H., and Pamilo, Pekka (1996), Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, Lee (2002), “Will Peace Follow?”, Will Peace Follow? 17:519–522.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, Lee, and Reeve, Hudson K. (1994), “Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy”, in Slater, Peter J.B. et al. (eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 23. New York: Academic Press, 101–133.Google Scholar
Ewald, Paul W. (1993), The Evolution of Infectious Disease. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fenner, Frank, and Fantini, Bernadino (1999), Biological Control of Vertebrate Pests: The History of Myxomatosis—an Experiment in Evolution. Oxford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Fenner, Frank, and Ratcliffe, F.N. (1965), Myxomatosis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Steve A. (1998), Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, Douglas J. (1979), Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Kerr, Benjamin, and Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2002), “Individualist and Multi-Level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations”, Individualist and Multi-Level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations 17:477–517.Google Scholar
Lack, David (1954), The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Andrew J. (1992), Viruses. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard (1970), “The Units of Selection”, The Units of Selection 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John (2002), “Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith” Biology and Philosophy 17:523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michod, Richard (1999), Darwinian Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir (2001), “Why Won't the Group Selection Controversy Go Away?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52:25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, Samir (2002), “Genetic Relatedness and the Evolution of Altruism”, Genetic Relatedness and the Evolution of Altruism 69:138–149.Google Scholar
Parer, Ian P. (1995), “Relationship Between Survival Rate and Survival Time of Rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) Challenged with Myxoma Virus”, Relationship Between Survival Rate and Survival Time of Rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) Challenged with Myxoma Virus 43:303–311.Google Scholar
Reeve, Hudson K. (2000), “Multi-Level Selection and Human Cooperation”, Multi-Level Selection and Human Cooperation 21:65–72.Google Scholar
Schmid-Hempel, Paul (1998), Parasitism in Social Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1993), Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Lewontin, Richard (1982), “Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection”, Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection 49:157–1980.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David Sloan (1994), “A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem”, A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem 61:534–555.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David Sloan (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David Sloan (2002), “Perspectives and Parameterizations: Commentary on Benjamin Kerr and Peter Godfrey-Smith's ‘Individualist and Multi-Level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations’”, Perspectives and Parameterizations: Commentary on Benjamin Kerr and Peter Godfrey-Smith's ‘Individualist and Multi-Level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations’ 17:529–537.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim (1996), “The Return of the Group”, The Return of the Group 63:562–84.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim, and Kitcher, Philip (1988), “The Return of the Gene”, The Return of the Gene 85:339–361.Google Scholar
Wade, Michael J. (1977), “An Experimental Study of Group Selection”, An Experimental Study of Group Selection 31:134–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Wade, Michael J. (1978), “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection”, A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection 53:101–114.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan (1975), “A Theory of Group Selection”, A Theory of Group Selection 72:143–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, David Sloan (1980), The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummins.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan (1983), “The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status”, The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status 14:159–187.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan (1989), “Levels of Selection: An Alternative to Individualism in the Human Sciences”, Levels of Selection: An Alternative to Individualism in the Human Sciences 11:257–272. Reprinted in Elliott Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. 2d ed.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 143–154.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan (1997), “Altruism and Organism: Disentangling the Themes of Multilevel Selection Theory”, Altruism and Organism: Disentangling the Themes of Multilevel Selection Theory 150 (supp.): S122–S134.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, David Sloan (2002), Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan, and Sober, Elliott (1994), “Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences”, Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences 17:585–654.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. (2003), “Pluralism, Entwinement, and the Levels of Selection”, Pluralism, Entwinement, and the Levels of Selection 70:531–552.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. (2004), Genes and the Agents of Life: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences: Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar