Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T20:24:08.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Realism and the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Harold Kincaid
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After sorting different structuralist claims, I argue that structural realist ideas are instantiated in the social sciences, providing both clarification of social science research and support for some components of structural realism. My main focus is on three distinct ways that the social sciences can be about structural relations—exemplified by claims about social structure, reduced form structures in causal modeling, and equilibrium explanations—and on the implication of structuralist ideas for thinking about issues concerning causal explanation and nonreductive pictures of the unity of the science.

Type
Structural Realism and the Special Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2008 , pp. 720 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright, Nancy (2007), Hunting Causes and Using Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1980), “Actions, Reasons, and Causes”, in Davidson, Donald, Essays on Action and Events. Oxford: Clarendon, 1–19.Google Scholar
Day, Timothy, and Kincaid, Harold (1994), “Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in Its Place”, Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in Its Place 98:271–295.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1991), “Real Patterns”, Real Patterns 88:27–51.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harold (1996), Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James, and Ross, Don, with Spurrett, David and Collier, John (2007), Everything Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl ([1867] 1992), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, introduced by Ernest Mandel and translated by Ben Fowkes. Vol. 1. New York: Penguin. Originally published as Das Kapital.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Phillip (1989), More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1986) Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott R. (1983), “Equilibrium Explanation”, Equilibrium Explanation 43:201–210.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott R. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, John (1998), Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. (2003), Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worrall, John (1994), “How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the ‘Luminiferous Ether'”, in Forbes, Micky and Hull, David M. (eds.), PSA 1994: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 334–342.Google Scholar