Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T02:32:45.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong Scientific Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

John Henry Harris
John Henry Harris*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Question: What is a (or the) scientific theory V based on a set B of syntactical L -formulas, interpreted according to the intended interpretations of the language L? What probably corresponds to the traditional candidate for V is found to be inadequate for use in deductively explaining experimental facts of a certain form. A second candidate for V, called a strong scientific theory (SST), does not suffer such an inadequacy because it is existentially strong, i.e., it has considerable existential import. It even satisfies the particle physicist's dictum: WHAT IS NOT FORBIDDEN WILL HAPPEN.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 182 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at philosophy colloquia at the Universities of Washington, Colorado and Illinois (Urbana) and at the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science.

References

[1] Enderton, H. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[2] Gouiron, R. Particles and Accelerators. New York: McGraw Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
[3] Guillemin, V. The Story of Quantum Mechanics, New York: Scribner, 1968.Google Scholar
[4] Harris, J. H. “On Comparing Theories.” Synthese 32(1975): 29–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Harris, J. H. and Locke, H. “On the Consistency of Strong Scientific Theories.” (In preparation).Google Scholar
[6] Mendelson, E. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1964.Google Scholar
[7] Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.Google Scholar
[8] Rothman, M. Discovering the Natural Laws. Garden City, N.J.: Doubleday, 1972.Google Scholar
[9] Watkins, J. W. N. “Metaphysics and the Advancement of Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26(1975): 91–121.10.1093/bjps/26.2.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar