Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:44:27.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Newton’s Principia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Simon Saunders
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the notion of an inertial frame is central to Newtonian mechanics and that the correct space-time structure underlying Newton’s methods in Principia is neo-Newtonian or Galilean space-time. I argue to the contrary that inertial frames are not needed in Newton’s theory of motion, and that the right space-time structure for Newton’s Principia requires the notion of parallelism of spatial directions at different times and nothing more.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 22 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

My thanks for encouragement, corrections, and criticisms to Julian Barbour, Harvey Brown, Oliver Pooley, Robert DiSalle, George Smith, and David Wallace. I owe a particular debt of gratitude to Julian: in conversations and writings he has long influenced my thinking on space-time matters.

References

Alexander, H. G., ed. 1986. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Opticks. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barbour, Julian. 1989. Absolute or Relative Motion? Vol. 1, The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barbour, Julian 1999. The End of Time. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. 1809. Eight Sermons, Preached at Robert Boyle’s Lecture, in the Year 1692: To Which Are Added, Three Sermons on Different Occasions. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Euginio and Rovelli, Carlo 2010. “Why All These Prejudices against a Constant?” arXiv.org, Cornell University Library. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.3966v3.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, Harvey. 2005. Physical Relativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cajori, Florian, ed. 1934. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Trans. Motte, A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
DiSalle, Robert. 2006. Understanding Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ehlers, Jürgen. 1973. “Survey of General Relativity Theory.” In Relativity, Astrophysics and Cosmology, ed. Israel, Werner. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, Willian. 2012. Isaac Newton’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 1970. “A Reformulation of Newtonian Dynamics.” American Journal of Physics 38:438–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huygens, Cristiaan. 1888/1888. Oeuvres Complètes. La Haye: Société Hollandaise des Sciences.Google Scholar
Knox, Eleanor. 2009. Geometry, Inertia, and Space-Time Structure. PhD diss., Oxford University.Google Scholar
Malament, David. 1995. “Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent?” Philosophy of Science 62:489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John. 1993. “A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology.” In Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, ed. M. Forbes, David Hull, and Katherine Okruhlik, 412–20, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Norton, John 1995. “The Force of Newtonian Cosmology: Acceleration Is Relative.” Philosophy of Science 62:511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John 1999. “The Cosmological Woes of Newtonian Gravitation Theory.” In The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity, ed. Goenner, Hubert, Renn, Jürgen, Ritter, Jim, and Sauer, Tilman, 271–323. Einstein Studies 7. Boston: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gerald. 1972. “Galilean Invariance and the General Covariance of Nonrelativistic Laws.” American Journal of Physics 40:683–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Saunders, Simon. 2003a. “Physics and Leibniz’s Principles.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, ed. Brading, Katherine and Castellani, Ellena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castellani, Ellena 2003b. “Indiscernibles, General Covariance, and Other Symmetries.” In Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics: Festschrift in Honour of John Stachel, ed. Ashtekar, Abay, Howard, Don, Renn, Jürgen, Sarkar, Sahotra, and Shimony, Abner. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ashtekar, Abay, Howard, Don, Renn, Jürgen, Sarkar, Sahotra, and Shimony, Abner 2013. “Indistinguishability.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, ed. Batterman, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Mary. 1836. On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Stachel, John. 1993. “The Meaning of General Covariance.” In Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grunbaum, ed. Earman, John, Janis, Allen, Massey, Gerald, and Rescher, Nicholas, 129–60. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard. 1967. “Newtonian Space-Time.” Texas Quarterly 10:174–200.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard 1977. “Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity.” In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, ed. Earman, John, Glymore, Clark, and Stachel, John. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tait, Peter. 1883. “Note on Reference Frames.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinborough, Session 1883–84:743–45.Google Scholar
Vickers, Peter. 2009. “Was Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40:197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar