Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:23:59.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Helen Longino

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Philip Kitcher*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kitcher, Philip (1982), “Genes”, Genes 33:337359.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984a), “1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences”, 1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences 93:335373.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984b), “Species”, Species 51:308333.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1999), “The Hegemony of Molecular Biology”, The Hegemony of Molecular Biology 14:195210.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2001a), Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2001b), “Real Realism: The Galilean Strategy”, Real Realism: The Galilean Strategy 110:151197.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (2002), The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim, and Kitcher, Philip (1988), “The Return of the Gene”, The Return of the Gene 85:335358.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1991), “Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection”, Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection 58:533573.Google Scholar