Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:40:18.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction and Emergence in Chemistry—Two Recent Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Eric Scerri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two articles on the reduction of chemistry are examined. The first, by McLaughlin (1992), claims that chemistry is reduced to physics and that there is no evidence for emergence or for downward causation between the chemical and the physical level. In a more recent article, Le Poidevin (2005) maintains that his combinatorial approach provides grounding for the ontological reduction of chemistry, which also circumvents some limitations in the physicalist program.

Type
Philosophy of Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2007 , pp. 920 - 931
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broad, C. D. (1925), The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1982), “Is Chemistry a Branch of Physics?”, Is Chemistry a Branch of Physics? 13:209–23.Google Scholar
Cunningham, B. (2001), “The Reemergence of Emergence”, The Reemergence of Emergence 68:S62–S75.Google Scholar
J⊘rgensen, Christian (1978), “Predictable Quarkonium Chemistry”, Predictable Quarkonium Chemistry 34:19–38.Google Scholar
Kim, Jagwon (1999), “Making Sense of Emergence”, Making Sense of Emergence 95:3–36.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin (2005), “Missing Elements and Missing Premises, A Combinatorial Argument for the Ontological Reduction of Chemistry”, Missing Elements and Missing Premises, A Combinatorial Argument for the Ontological Reduction of Chemistry 56:117–134.Google Scholar
Lightman, Alan (2005), The Discoveries. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian (1992), “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism”, in Beckerman, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospect of a Non-reductive Physicalism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 49–93.Google Scholar
Paneth, Freidrich (1962), “The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Elements”, The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Elements 13:1–14, 144–160.Google Scholar
Pauling, Linus (1928), “The Shared-Electron Chemical Bond”, The Shared-Electron Chemical Bond 14:359–362.Google ScholarPubMed
Scerri, Eric R. (1994), “Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?”, in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Burian, R. (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 160–170.Google Scholar
Scerri, Eric R. (2007), The Periodic Table, Its Story and Its Significance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitesides, George and Ismagilov, R. F. (1999), “Complexity in Chemistry”, Complexity in Chemistry 284:89–92.Google ScholarPubMed