Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:44:41.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum Mechanics as Classical Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Charles T. Sebens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here I explore a novel no-collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics that combines aspects of two familiar and well-developed alternatives, Bohmian mechanics and the many-worlds interpretation. Despite reproducing the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, the theory looks surprisingly classical. All there is at the fundamental level are particles interacting via Newtonian forces. There is no wave function. However, there are many worlds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 266 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to David Baker, Gordon Belot, Cian Dorr, Detlef Dürr, J. Dmitri Gallow, Sheldon Goldstein, Michael Hall, Daniel Peterson, Laura Ruetsche, Ward Struyve, Nicola Vona, and two anonymous referees for very useful feedback on drafts of this article. Thank you to Adam Becker, Sean Carroll, Dirk-André Deckert, Neil Dewar, Benjamin Feintzeig, Sophie Monahan, Cat Saint-Croix, Jonathan Shaheen, and Howard Wiseman for helpful discussions. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE 0718128.

References

Albert, D. Z. 1994. Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, D. Z. 1996. “Elementary Quantum Metaphysics.” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 184:277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, D. Z. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N. 2011. “Many Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballentine, L. E. 1998. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. A. 1999. The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967. An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boström, K. J. 2012. “Combining Bohm and Everett: Axiomatics for a Standalone Quantum Mechanics.” Unpublished manuscript, arXiv.org. http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5632.Google Scholar
Brown, H. R., and Wallace, D. 2005. “Solving the Measurement Problem: De Broglie-Bohm Loses out to Everett.” Foundations of Physics 35 (4): 517–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S., and Cowling, T. G. 1970. The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. 1996. “Comment on Lockwood.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2): 222–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewdney, C., Holland, P. R., and Kyprianidis, A. 1986. “What Happens in a Spin Measurement?” Physics Letters A 119 (6): 259–67.Google Scholar
Dickson, W. M. 1998. Quantum Chance and Non-locality: Probability and Non-locality in the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, C. 2009. “Finding Ordinary Objects in Some Quantum Worlds.” Unpublished manuscript, New York University. https://files.nyu.edu/cd50/public/papers/Finding.pdf.Google Scholar
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. 1992. “Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty.” Journal of Statistical Physics 67 (5): 843–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, D., and Teufel, S. 2009. Bohmian Mechanics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Elga, A. 2004. “Defeating Dr. Evil with Self-Locating Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2): 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S., and Struyve, W. 2007. “On the Uniqueness of Quantum Equilibrium in Bohmian Mechanics.” Journal of Statistical Physics 128 (5): 1197–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. J. W., Deckert, D.-A., and Wiseman, H. M. 2014. “Quantum Phenomena Modelled by Interactions between Many Classical Worlds.” Physical Review X 4:041013.Google Scholar
Holland, P. R. 1993. The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511622687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P. R. 2005. “Computing the Wavefunction from Trajectories: Particle and Wave Pictures in Quantum Mechanics and Their Relation.” Annals of Physics 315 (2): 505–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1979. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se.” Philosophical Review 88 (4): 513–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madelung, E. 1927. “Quantentheorie in Hydrodynamischer Form.” Zeitschrift für Physik A 40 (3): 322–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, T. 2010. “Can the World Be Only Wavefunction?” In Saunders et al. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, B. 2010. “Bohmian Mechanics without Pilot Waves.” Chemical Physics 370 (1–3): 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D., eds. 2010. Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, J., and Poirier, B. 2012. “Communication: Quantum Mechanics without Wavefunctions.” Journal of Chemical Physics 136:031102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takabayasi, T. 1952. “On the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Associated with Classical Pictures.” Progress of Theoretical Physics 8 (2): 143–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipler, F. J. 2006. “What about Quantum Theory? Bayes and the Born Interpretation.” Unpublished manuscript, arXiv.org. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611245.Google Scholar
Valentini, A. 1997. “On Galilean and Lorentz Invariance in Pilot-Wave Dynamics.” Physics Letters A 228 (4): 215–22.Google Scholar
Valentini, A. 2010. “De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial?” In Saunders et al. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, A., and Westman, H. 2005. “Dynamical Origin of Quantum Probabilities.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 461 (2053): 253–72.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. 2003. “Everett and Structure.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 34 (1): 87–105.10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00085-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D. 2012. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallstrom, T. C. 1994. “Inequivalence between the Schrödinger Equation and the Madelung Hydrodynamic Equations.” Physical Review A 49 (3): 1613–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, R. E. 2005. Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories: Introduction to Quantum Hydrodynamics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar