Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:12:25.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantification of Uncertainties of Future Climate Change: Challenges and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Linda O. Mearns
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increasing societal concerns regarding the potential deleterious effects of future climate change have galvanized efforts to manage the problem both through reduction of greenhouse gases (mitigation) and through development of plans to reduce the impacts of climate change that cannot be avoided (adaptation). These critical activities require making decisions under conditions of considerable uncertainty regarding future conditions in physical and human systems. As the focus on providing information about future climate for taking actions to cope with climate change, the science of uncertainty of climate change will develop more and more with the needs of decision makers in mind.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , December 2010 , pp. 998 - 1011
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carter, Timothy R., et al. 2007. “New Assessment Methods and the Characterization of Future Conditions.” In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, ed. Parry, M. et al., 133–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CCSP (Climate Change Science Program). 2003. Strategic Plan of the US Climate Change Science Program. Washington, DC: CCSP.Google Scholar
CCSP (Climate Change Science Program). 2009. Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making. Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2. Washington, DC: CCSP.Google Scholar
Christensen, J., et al. 2007. “Regional Climate Projections.” In Solomon et al. 2007, 847–940.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. J., and Wilby, R. L.. 2007. “Beyond the Downscaling Comparison Study.” International Journal of Climatology 27:1543–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F., and Mearns, L. O.. 2002. “Calculation of Best Estimate, Confidence, and Uncertainty in Regional Climate Changes from AOGCM Simulations via the ‘Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA)’ Method.” Journal of Climate 15:1141–58.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F., and Mearns, L. O.. 2003. “Probability of Regional Climate Change Calculated Using the Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) Method.” Geophysical Research Letters 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL017130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleckler, P., Taylor, K. E., and Doutriaux, C.. 2008. “Performance Metrics for Climate Models.” Journal of Geophysical Research 113, doi:10.1029/2007/JD008972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, A. L., Goddard, L., and Lal, U.. 2006. “Probabilistic Multi-model Regional Temperature Change Projections.” Journal of Climate 19:4326–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, David G., Knopman, Debra, Lempert, Robert, Berry, Sandra, and Wainfan, Lynne. 2007. Presenting Uncertainty about Climate Change to Water Resource Managers. RAND TR-505-NSF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Groves, David G., and Lempert, Robert J.. 2007. “A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios.” Global Environmental Change 17:73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, David G., Lempert, Robert J., Knopman, Debra, and Berry, Sandra H.. 2008. Preparing for an Uncertain Future Climate in the Inland Empire: Identifying Robust Water-Management Strategies. RAND DB-550-NSF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. D., and Griggs, D. J.. 2004. “Ensembles-Based Predictions of Climate Changes and Their Impacts (ENSEMBLES).” EOS 85 (52): 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, J. T., et al., eds. 1995. Climate Change 1995: The Scientific Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houghton, J. T.. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R., and Mearns, L. O.. 2005. “Assessing Future Climate Risks.” In UNDP Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change, ed. Lim, B. and Spanger-Siegfreid, E., 119–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, R., et al. 2004. “Characterizing Climate-Change Uncertainties for Decision Makers.” Climatic Change 65:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth A. 2009. “Varieties of Support and Confirmation of Climate Models.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83 (Suppl.): 217–36.Google Scholar
Maurer, Edwin P., et al. 2007. “Fine-Resolution Climate Projections Enhance Regional Climate Change Impact Studies.” EOS 88:504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearns, L. O., et al. 1999. “Comparative Responses of EPIC and CERES Crop Models to High and Low Resolution Climate Change Scenarios.” Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (D6): 6623–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearns, L. O.. 2001. “Climate Scenario Development.” In Houghton et al. 2001, 583–638.Google Scholar
Mearns, L. O.. 2009. “The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: An Overview.” EOS 90:311–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G. A., et al. 2007. “Global Climate Projections.” In Solomon et al. 2007, 901–45.Google Scholar
Moss, R., et al. 2008. Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M., et al. 2007. “A Methodology for Probabilistic Predictions of Regional Climate Change from Perturbed Physics Ensembles.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365:1993–2028.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, J. M.. 2009. UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. Exeter: UK Meteorological Office.Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., et al. 2000. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
New, M., et al. 2007. “Challenges in Using Probabilistic Climate Change Information for Impacts Assessments: An Example from the Water Sector.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365:2117–32.Google ScholarPubMed
NPCC (New York City Panel on Climate Change). 2009. Climate Risk Information. New York: NPCC.Google Scholar
NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Evaluating Progress on the US Climate Change Science Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, B. 2004. “Conditional Probabilistic Population Projections: An Application to Climate Change.” International Statistical Review 72 (2): 167–84.Google Scholar
Parker, W. S. 2006. “Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling.” Foundations of Science 11:349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parson, E., et al. 2007. Global Change Scenarios: Their Development and Use. CCSP Synthesis Product 2.1b. Washington, DC: CCSP.Google Scholar
Petersen, A. C. 2006. Simulating Nature: A Philosophical Study of Computer-Simulation Uncertainties and Their Role in Climate Science and Policy Advice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
Solomon, S., et al., eds. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tebaldi, C., and Knutti, R.. 2007. “The Use of the Multi-model Ensembles in Probabilistic Climate Projections.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365:2053–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Tebaldi, C., and Lobell, D. B.. 2008. “Towards Probabilistic Projections of Climate Change Impacts on Global Crop Yields.” Geophysical Research Letters 13, doi:10:1029/2008Gl033423.Google Scholar
Tebaldi, C., et al. 2004. “Regional Probabilities of Precipitation Change: A Bayesian Approach.” Geophysical Research Letters 31:L24213, doi:10.1029/2004GL021276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebaldi, C.. 2005. “Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Regional Climate Change: A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Multi-model Ensembles.” Journal of Climate 18:1524–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. D., et al. 2003. “Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response.” Climatic Change 61 (3): 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L., and Raper, S.. 2001. “Interpretations of High Projections of Global Mean Warming.” Science 293 (5529): 451–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar