Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:33:08.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Andrea I. Woody
Andrea I. Woody*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Box 353350, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most contemporary chemists consider quantum mechanics to be the foundational theory of their discipline, although few of the calculations that a strict reduction would seem to require have ever been produced. In this essay I discuss contemporary algebraic and diagrammatic representations of molecular systems derived from quantum mechanical models, specifically configuration interaction wavefunctions for ab initio calculations and molecular orbital energy diagrams. My aim is to suggest that recent dissatisfaction with reductive accounts of chemical theory may stem from both the inability of standard accounts of reduction to incorporate the diverse forms of representation found in chemical practice and our philosophical predilection to analyze all connections between theories in terms of logical reduction.

Type
Philosophy of Physics and Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S612 - S627
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Born, Max and Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1927), “Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln”, Annalen der Physik 84: 457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Charles A. (1961), Valence, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daudel, Raymond and Pullman, Alberte (eds.) (1971), Aspects de la Chimie Quantique Contemporaine. Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 195. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Dirac, Paul (1929), “Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 123: 714–733.Google Scholar
Foster, J. M. and Boys, S. F. (1960), “Quantum Variational Calculations for a Range of CH2 Configurations”, Reviews of Modern Physics 32: 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartree, Douglas R. (1928), “Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods. Part II. Some Results and Discussion”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 28: 89–110, 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitler, Walter and London, F. (1927), “Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und homoopolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik”, Zeitschrift fur Physik 44: 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Hubert M. and Coolidge, A. S. (1933), “The Ground State of the Hydrogen Molecule”, Journal of Chemical Physics 1: 825–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jean, Yves and Volatron, Francois (1993), An Introduction to Molecular Orbitals. Translated and edited by Burdett, Jeremy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karplus, Martin and Porter, Richard (1970), Atoms and Molecules. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1929), “The Electronic Structure of Some Diatomic Molecules”, Transactions of the Faraday Society, Volume XXV(II): 668–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maksíc, Zvonimir B. (ed.) (1990), Theoretical Models of Chemical Bonding. Part 1: Atomic Hypothesis and the Concept of Molecular Structure. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWeeny, Roy (1973), Quantum Mechanics: Methods and Basic Applications. The International Encyclopedia of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, vol. 2, 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Primas, Hans (1983), Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics, and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Jeffrey L. (1997), “Molecular Shape, Reduction, Explanation and Approximate Concepts”, Synthese 111: 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scerri, Eric (1994), “Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?”, in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Burian, R. (eds.), PSA 1994, vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 160–170.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Henry F. III (1984), Quantum Chemistry: The Development of Ab Initio Methods in Molecular Electronic Structure Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weininger, Stephen J. (1984), “The Molecular Structure Conundrum: Can Classical Chemistry be Reduced to Quantum Chemistry?” Journal of Chemical Education 61: 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, R. G. (1978), “Must a Molecule Have a Shape?”, Journal of the American Chemical Society 100: 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar