Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:24:31.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probability and Conditionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Robert C. Stalnaker*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to draw a connection between a semantical theory of conditional statements and the theory of conditional probability. First, the probability calculus is interpreted as a semantics for truth functional logic. Absolute probabilities are treated as degrees of rational belief. Conditional probabilities are explicitly defined in terms of absolute probabilities in the familiar way. Second, the probability calculus is extended in order to provide an interpretation for counter-factual probabilities—conditional probabilities where the condition has zero probability. Third, conditional propositions are introduced as propositions whose absolute probability is equal to the conditional probability of the consequent on the antecedent. An axiom system for this conditional connective is recovered from the probabilistic definition. Finally, the primary semantics for this axiom system, presented elsewhere, is related to the probabilistic interpretation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The preparation of this paper was supported under National Science Foundation Grant, GS-1567.

References

[1] Adams, E. W., “The Logic of Conditionals,” Inquiry, vol. 8, 1965, pp. 166197.10.1080/00201746508601430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Adams, E. W., “Probability and the Logic of Conditionals,” in Jaakko Hintikka and Patrick Suppes, Aspects of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam, 1966, pp. 265316.10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71673-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
[4] Jeffrey, R. C., “If” (abstract), Journal of Philosophy, vol. 61, 1964, pp. 702703.Google Scholar
[5] Kemeny, J., “Fair Bets and Inductive Probabilities,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 20, 1955, pp. 263273.10.2307/2268222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Kyburg, H., and Smokier, H., Studies in Subjective Probability, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
[7] Leblanc, H., “On Requirements for Conditional Probability Functions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 25, 1960, pp. 238242.10.2307/2964681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Lehman, R., “On Confirmation and Rational Betting,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 20, 1955, pp. 255262.10.2307/2268221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Popper, K. R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
[10] Quine, van O., Methods of Logic (revised edition), New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[11] Shimony, A., “Coherence and the Axioms of Confirmation,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 20, 1955, pp. 128.10.2307/2268039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Skyrms, B., “Nomological Necessity and the Paradoxes of Confirmation,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 33, 1966, pp. 230349.10.1086/288096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Stalnaker, R. C., “A Theory of Conditionals,” Studies in Logical Theory (supplementary monograph to the American Philosophical Quarterly), forthcoming.Google Scholar
[14] Stalnaker, R. C. and Thomason, R. H., “A Semantic Analysis of Conditional Logic,” Mimeo., 1967.Google Scholar