Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:32:23.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pluralism without Genic Causes?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Since the fundamental challenge that I laid at the doorstep of the pluralists was to defend, with nonderivative models, a strong notion of genic cause, it is fatal that Waters has failed to meet that challenge. Waters agrees with me that there is only a single cause operating in these models, but he argues for a notion of causal ‘parsing’ to sustain the viability of some form of pluralism. Waters and his colleagues have some very interesting and important ideas about the sciences, involving pluralism and parsing or partitioning causes, but they are ideas in search of an example. He thinks he has found an example in the case of hierarchical and genic selection. I think he has not.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Jason Baker, Stephen Crowley, Melinda Fagan, Patrick Forber, and Michael Weisberg for their extensive comments and discussion. We are indebted to Ken Waters for his generous assistance and friendship throughout the production of these papers.

References

Dugatkin, Lee Allan, and Reeve, Hudson Kern (1994), “Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy”, Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy 23:101133.Google Scholar
Goodnight, Charles, and Stevens, Lori (1997), “Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell Us about Group Selection in Nature?”, Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell Us about Group Selection in Nature? 150:S59S79.Google ScholarPubMed
Kerr, Benjamin, and Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2002), “Individualist and Multilevel Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations”, Individualist and Multilevel Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations 17:477517.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, Sterelny, Kim, and Waters, Kenneth (1990), “The Illusory Riches of Sober’s Monism”, The Illusory Riches of Sober’s Monism 87:158160.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard (1962), “Interdeme Selection Controlling a Polymorphism in the House Mouse”, Interdeme Selection Controlling a Polymorphism in the House Mouse 96:6578.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard, and Dunn, Leslie Clarence (1960), “The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse”, The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse 45:705722.Google ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. ([1988] 1994), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Reprint. Originally published by Greenwood Press. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. (2005), “Why the Gene Will Not Return”, Why the Gene Will Not Return 72:287310.Google Scholar
Michod, Richard (1982), “The Theory of Kin Selection”, The Theory of Kin Selection 13:2355.Google Scholar
Neel, James (1947), “The Clinical Detection of the Genetic Carriers of Inherited Disease”, The Clinical Detection of the Genetic Carriers of Inherited Disease 26:115153.Google ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, Kim, and Kitcher, Philip (1988), “The Return of the Gene”, The Return of the Gene 85:339361.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, William, and Huck, John (1923), “The Inheritance of Sickle-Cell Anemia in Man”, The Inheritance of Sickle-Cell Anemia in Man 8:594598.Google ScholarPubMed
Wade, Michael (1985), “Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection”, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection 125:6173.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1991), “Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection”, Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection 58:553573.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (2005), “Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay”, Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay 72:311333.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: