Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:21:53.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy of Science that Ignores Science: Race, IQ and Heritability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Neven Sesardic
Neven Sesardic*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers of science widely believe that the hereditarian theory about racial differences in IQ is based on methodological mistakes and confusions involving the concept of heritability. I argue that this “received view” is wrong: methodological criticisms popular among philosophers are seriously misconceived, and the discussion in philosophy of science about these matters is largely disconnected from the real, empirically complex issues debated in science.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 580 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Rik Hine, Arthur Jensen, Hong-Hwa Lee, Gianmatteo Mameli, David Papineau, Alexander Rosenberg, Mark Sainsbury, Dusko Sekulic, Elliott Sober, Kim Sterelny and two anonymous referees for Philosophy of Science for helpful feedback on earlier drafts. Needless to say, none of them should be assumed to agree with the main claims of this paper. I am also grateful to Jim Brown, Philip Kitcher, Robert Richardson and Sahotra Sarkar for comments on my criticisms of their views.

References

Block, Ned (1974), Letter to Psychology Today (March).Google Scholar
Block, Ned. (1995), “How Heritability Misleads About Race”, Cognition 56: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, Ned. and Dworkin, Gerald (eds.) (1976), The IQ Controversy. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Brody, Nathan (1992), Intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, James R. (1998), “Intellectual Tithing”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1996), “In Praise of Intolerance to Charlatanism in Academia”, in Gross, Paul, Levitt, Norman, and Lewis, Martin W. (eds.), The Flight from Science and Reason. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 96–115.Google Scholar
Crow, James F. (1969), “Genetic Theories and Influences: Comments on the Values of Diversity”, in Environment, Heredity and Intelligence (Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 2), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman (1976), “IQ, Heritability and Human Nature”, in Cohen, Robert S. et al. (eds.), PSA 1974. Dordrecht: Reidel, 143–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Bernard (1986), Storm over Biology. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael (1981), “Ought Research to Be Unrestricted?”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 12–13: 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, James R. (1980), Race, IQ and Jensen. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Flynn, James R. (1987), “Race and IQ: Jensen's Case Refuted”, in Modgil, Sohan and Modgil, Celia (eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press, 221–232.Google Scholar
Flynn, James R. (1989), “Rushton, Evolution, and Race: An Essay on Intelligence and Race”, Psychologist 2: 363–366.Google Scholar
Flynn, James R. (1999a), “Evidence Against Rushton: The Genetic Loading of WISC-R Subtests and the Causes of Between-Group Differences”, Personality and Individual Differences 26: 373–379.Google Scholar
Flynn, James R. (1999b), “Searching for Justice: The Discovery of IQ Gains Over Time”, American Psychologist 54: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. (1981), The Mismeasure of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J. (1971), “IQ”, Atlantic Monthly (September): 43–64.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J. (1973), IQ in the Meritocracy. Boston and Toronto: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J. and Murray, Charles (1994), The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1968), “Another Look at Culture-Fair Tests”, in Measurement for Educational Planning: Western Regional Conference on Testing Problems. Berkeley: Educational Testing Service, Western Office, 50–104.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1969a), “How Much Can We Boost I.Q. and Scholastic Achievement?”, Harvard Educational Review 39: 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1969b), “Reducing the Heredity-Environment Uncertainty”, in Environment, Heredity and Intelligence (Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 2), 209–243.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1972), Genetics and Education. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1973a), Educability and Group Differences. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1973b), Educational Differences. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1976), “Race and Genetics of Intelligence: A Reply to Lewontin”, reprinted in Block and Dworkin (1976), 93–106. Originally appeared in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists May 1970.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1981a), Straight Talk about Mental Tests. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1981b), “Obstacles, Problems, and Pitfalls in Differential Psychology”, in Scarr, Sandra (ed.), Race, Social Class, and Individual Differences in I.Q. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 483–514.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1982), “The Debunking of Scientific Fossils and Straw Persons”, Contemporary Education Review 1: 121–135.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1994), “Race and IQ Scores”, in Sternberg, Robert. J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York: Macmillan, 899–907.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1998), The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984), “The Case Against Sociobiology”, The New York Times Book Review (May 20): 9.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1997), The Lives to Come. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
Jensen, Arthur R. (1998), “A Plea for Science Studies”, in Koertge, Noretta (ed.), A House Built on Sand. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32–56.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1975), “Genetic Aspects of Intelligence”, Annual Review of Genetics 9: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard C. (1976), “Race and Intelligence”, reprinted in Block and Dworkin 1976, 79–92. Originally appeared in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists May 1970.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. (1990), Science As Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackintosh, Nicholas J. (1998), IQ and Human Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, John S. (1988), “A New Look at Morton's Craniological Research”, Current Anthropology 29: 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric (1997), “Never a Dull Moment”, American Psychologist 52: 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Robert C. (1987), “Reply to Flynn”, in Modgil, Sohan and Modgil, Celia (eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press, 233–235.Google Scholar
Papineau, David (1982), “Nature and Nurture”, Journal of Medical Ethics 8: 96–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, Robert C. (1984), “Biology and Ideology: The Interpenetration of Science and Values”, Philosophy of Science 51: 396–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Joseph L. (2000), “A Critique of the Flynn Effect: Massive IQ Gains, Methodological Artifacts, or Both?”, Intelligence 26: 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Steven, Lewontin, Richard C., and Kamin, Leon J. (1984), Not In Our Genes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarkar, Sahotra (1998), Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyderman, Mark and Rothman, Stanley (1988), The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J. (ed.) (1982), Handbook of Human Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar