Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:40:42.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Operationism Analysed Operationally

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Hornell Hart
Hornell Hart*
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, N. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stevens (7 pp. 249-251) has presented a “lusty embryonic” Science of Science, as having arisen out of “operationism as a revolution against absolute and undefinable concepts in physics, behaviorism as a revolution against dualistic mentalism in psychology, and Logical Positivism as a revolution against rational metaphysics in philosophy.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 1940 , pp. 288 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bridgman, P. W. The Intelligent Individual and Society. New York: Macmillan, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. McGregor, J. H. in General Anthropology, edited by Boas, Franz, Boston: Heath, 1938.Google Scholar
3. Russell, Bertrand. Religion and Science, New York: Holt, 1935.Google Scholar
4. Stevens, S. S. The operational basis of psychology. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Stevens, S. S. The operational definition of psychological concepts. Psychol. Rev., 1935, 42, 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stevens, S. S. Psychology: the propaedeutic science. Phil. Sci., 1936, 3, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Stevens, S. S. Psychology and the science of science. Psychol. Bull., 1939, 36, 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar