Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:54:34.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Gödel and the Ideality of Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Gödel’s remarks concerning the ideality of time are examined. In the literature, some of these remarks have been somewhat neglected while others have been heavily criticized. In this article, I propose a clear and defensible sense in which Gödel’s work bears on the question whether there is an objective lapse of time in our world.

Type
Space, Time, and Space-Time
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Thomas Barrett, Gordon Belot, David Malament, Steve Savitt, and Jim Weatherall for helpful discussions. Special thanks to Thomas Barrett for presenting this article a few days before the birth of baby June. The article is dedicated to baby June.

References

Belot, G. 2005. “Dust, Time, and Symmetry.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56:255–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J. 1991. Quantum Profiles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. 2002. “On Becoming, Cosmic Time, and Rotating Universes.” In Time, Reality, and Existence, ed. Callender, C., 253–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. 2015. “Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. 1968. “What Is a Singularity in General Relativity?Annals of Physics 48:526–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroch, R. 1971. “General Relativity in the Large.” General Relativity and Gravitation 2:6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, C. 1977. “Indistinguishable Space-Times and the Fundamental Group.” In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, ed. J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel, 50–60. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. 1949a. “An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation.” Review of Modern Physics 21:447–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, K. 1949b. “A Remark about the Relationship between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. Schilpp, P. A., 557–62. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hawking, S., and Ellis, G.. 1973. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, D. 1977. “Observationally Indistinguishable Space-Times.” In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, ed. J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel, 61–80. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Malament, D. 2012. Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchak, J. 2009. “Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime?Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40:5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savitt, S. 1994. “The Replacement of Time.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeenk, C., and Wüthrich, C.. 2011. “Time Travel and Time Machines.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, ed. Callender, C., 577632. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1970. “On the Paradoxical Time-Structures of Gödel.” Philosophy of Science 37:589601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, R. 1984. General Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yourgrau, P. 1991. The Disappearance of Time: Kurt Gödel and the Idealistic Tradition in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar