Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-18T21:44:28.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Birkhoff's and Einstein's Relativity Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Carlton W. Berenda
Carlton W. Berenda*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts State College, Amherst, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The philosopher who is interested in developments of modern physics may turn with some profit to an argument that has recently evolved between the late George Birkhoff and Hermann Weyl. Birkhoff and his associates have constructed a theory of relativity differing in various ways from Einstein's general theory. Weyl (1) has offered a critical analysis of the Birkhoff theory along with a defense of the Einstein theory; and Birkhoff (2) has presented his rebuttal to Weyl.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1945 , pp. 116 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Weyl, H., Math. Rev., 4, 285; 1943.Google Scholar
2. Barajas, Birkhoff, Graef, Vallarta, Phys. Rev., 66, Nos. 5 & 6, 138; 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Berenda, C. W., Phys. Rev., letter to the editor, Jan. 1945.Google Scholar
4. Birkhoff, , Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 29, 231; 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Whitehead, A. N., Principle of Relativity.Google Scholar
6. Rosen, N., Phys. Rev., 57, No. 2, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Reichenbach, H., Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre.Google Scholar
8. Weinberg, C. B., Philos. of Sci., 8, No. 4, pp. 506–532, 618–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bergmann, P., An Introduction to the Theory of Relativity, pp. 185–186.Google Scholar
10. Tolman, R., Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, p. 59.Google Scholar