Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:47:35.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objectivity in the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Eleanor Bisbee*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Amerikan Koleji, Instanbul, Turkey

Extract

To be scientific is to be objective. This is a sine qua non in the social scientists’ efforts to keep their researches on a par with those of the natural scientists. The extreme differences of subject matter in the two fields, however, make it difficult to maintain an even standard of objectivity. Whether objectivity is defined in the strict Cartesian sense or in a broader sense also makes a difference. The Cartesian meaning threatens to enslave the social sciences to Physics as the Lord of All Sciences, and this possibility is so familiar that it needs but brief comment. A broader interpretation of objectivity meets with complications which are only inadequately recognized as yet, and which may call for reinterpretation of the scope of science or else may open up new and independent avenues of opportunity beyond the limitations of science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tugwell, R. G., Editor: “The Trend of Economics,” p. 479.

2 Reports of the Board of Education and the commission of investigation, Cincinnati, Ohio, spring of 1936.

3 For an interesting view on subjectivity in measurements in physics, see article by Douglas McGregor on “Scientific Measurement and Psychology,” Psychological Review, May, 1935.

4 For my initial clue to this point, I am indebted to an article by Van de Walle, “A Fundamental Difference between the Natural and Social Sciences” in the Journal of Philosophy, September 29, 1932.

5 A. N. Whitehead, “The Function of Reason,” pp. 8 and 12. Parentheses mine.