Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:03:37.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objectivism and Interactionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Joseph Margolis
Joseph Margolis*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The views of linguistic analysts and objectivists are explored with regard to the question of interactionism. It is argued that the admission of a logical difference between explanation by cause and explanation by motive cannot disqualify causal explanations of human action, cannot be construed as challenging the competence of science, and cannot count against interactionism. It is also argued that objectivist programs for eliminating mentalistic concepts either implicitly admit interactionism or cannot distinguish relevantly between interactionism and parallelism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 1966 , pp. 118 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bergmann, Gustav, “Purpose, Function, Scientific Explanation,” Acta Sociologica 5 (1962), pp. 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Brodbeck, May, “Meaning and Action,” Philosophy of Science 30 (1963), pp. 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Hampshire, Stuart, Thought and Action (London, 1959).Google Scholar
[4] Kenny, Anthony, Action, Emotion and Will (London, 1963).Google Scholar
[5] Margolis, Joseph, “Brain Processes and Sensations,” Theoria, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[6] Melden, A. I., Free Action (London, 1961).Google Scholar
[7] Nowell-Smith, P. H., “Freewill and Moral Responsibility,” Mind, LVII (1948), pp. 45–61.10.1093/mind/LVII.225.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Peters, R. S., The Concept of Motivation (London, 1958).Google Scholar
[9] Smart, J. J. C., “Sensations and Brain Processes,” Philosophical Review, LXVIII (1959). pp. 141–156.10.2307/2182164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science (London, 1958).Google Scholar