Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:17:39.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural Selection as a Mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Skipper and Millstein (2005) argued that existing conceptions of mechanisms failed to “get at” natural selection but left open the possibility that a refined conception of mechanisms could resolve the problems that they identified. I respond to Skipper and Millstein, and argue that while many of their points have merit, their objections can be overcome and that natural selection can be characterized as a mechanism. In making this argument, I discuss the role of regularity in mechanisms, and develop an account of stochastic (i.e., probabilistic) mechanisms. Explaining the phenomenon of adaptation through the mechanism of natural selection illustrates the power and flexibility of using mechanistic strategies to explain natural phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Lindley Darden for feedback and encouragement.

References

REFERENCES

Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele (2005), “Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative”, Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative 36:421441.Google Scholar
Bogen, James (2005), “Regularities and Causality: Generalizations and Causal Explanations”, Regularities and Causality: Generalizations and Causal Explanations 36:397420.Google ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, Frederick, and Rosenberg, Alex (2004), “Fitness, Probability, and the Principles of Natural Selection”, Fitness, Probability, and the Principles of Natural Selection 55:693712.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Frederick, and Rosenberg, Alex (2005), “Matthen and Ariew's Obituary for Fitness: Reports of Its Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated”, Matthen and Ariew's Obituary for Fitness: Reports of Its Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated 20:343353.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley, and Cain, Joseph A. (1989), “Selection Type Theories”, Selection Type Theories 56:106129.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (1992), Mechanisms, Models and Causation. PhD Dissertation. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (1996), “Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation”, Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation 44:4971.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (2002), “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”, Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation 69 (Proceedings): S342S353.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Anthony J. F., et al. (2004), An Introduction to Genetic Analysis. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. (2000), “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Thinking about Mechanisms 67:125.Google Scholar
Matthen, Mahon, and Ariew, Andrew (2002), “Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness and Natural Selection”, Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness and Natural Selection 99:5583.Google Scholar
Matthen, Mahon, and Ariew, Andrew (2005), “How to Understand Causal Relationships in Natural Selection: Reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard”, How to Understand Causal Relationships in Natural Selection: Reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard 20:355364.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. (2006), “Natural Selection as a Population Level Causal Process”, Natural Selection as a Population Level Causal Process 57:627653.Google Scholar
Seeley, Rabin Hadlock (1986), “Intense Natural Selection Caused a Rapid Morphological Transition in a Living Marine Snail”, Intense Natural Selection Caused a Rapid Morphological Transition in a Living Marine Snail 83:68976901.Google Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr., and Millstein, Roberta L. (2005), “Thinking about Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection”, Thinking about Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection 36:327347.Google ScholarPubMed
Tabery, James G. (2004), “Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism”, Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism 71:115.Google Scholar