Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:33:00.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodology of Research and Progress in Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Erwin Biser  and
Enos E. Witmer
Erwin Biser
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, University of Pennsylvania
Enos E. Witmer
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the advent of the relativity theory science has entered a transformative period in which previous certainties are undergoing critical scrutiny and renovation. Critical movements in science arise at periods of its history when its foundations are brought into question. True it is that natural philosophers still regard science as a growing body of propositions dealing with natural events enabling them to find the structural laws of the external world. But this “external world” about them changes in significance, interpretation, and meaning as new epoch-making theories are propounded and experimental verification of some of their consequences tend to give them scientific plausibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 1947 , pp. 275 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mach, E., The Science of Mechanics, Translated by McCormack, Thomas J., Open Court Publishing Company, 1893, p. 229.Google Scholar
2. Loc. cit., pp. 216–221.Google Scholar
3. Äther und Relativitätstheoire, Einstein, von Albert, p. 12. Berlin Verlag von Julius Springer, 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. “A General Schema for Natural Systems,” by Biser, Erwin, Westbrook Publishing Co., 1938, pp. 114, 115.Google Scholar
5. “The Logic of Modern Physics,” by Bridgman, P. W., p. 2, Macmillan & Company, 1927.Google Scholar
6. Loc. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar
7. Paper read by Professor Maier, N. R., at the A.A.A.S. 1939 meeting at Richmond, Virginia. A film produced by A. Ford, of Lehigh University has been published so far.Google Scholar
8. Reichenbach refers to facts of zero-order as being certain and unchallengeable. Evidently he is referring to isolated sense-data, if such there be, of individuals. But these can not be given the status of scientific facts as defined in our discourse, because even the statement of a scientific fact as used in this paper rests upon a background of theory. The term specific charge of α-particles has no meaning apart from an atomic theory. See Handbuch der Physik, vol. IV, pp. 13–16.Google Scholar
9. Weyl, the Open World, New Haven, 1932, p. 40.Google Scholar