Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:55:41.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Louis Althusser's Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists and Other Essays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Aristides Baltas
Aristides Baltas*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, National Technical University
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Physics Department, National Technical University, Zografou Campus, Athens 157 80, Greece.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alasdair MacIntyre's expression of the “profound gratitude we all owe to Althusser for having brought French Marxism back into dialogue with the rest of French philosophy” (as quoted by Elliott in his introduction to the selection under discussion, 1990, xi), important as it may be for a host of reasons, did not try to make Althusser's philosophy particularly attractive to philosophers of science. However, the present selection of essays does precisely this: It is almost ideally designed to mark the beginnings of an effective encounter of this particular brand of “French Marxism” with philosophy of science.

Type
Critical Notice
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 647 - 658
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am indebted to Peter Machamer and to Wal Suchting for their comments.

References

Althusser, L. (1971), “Freud and Lacan”, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Translated by B. Brewster. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1990), Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists and Other Essays. Edited by Elliott, G. Translated by Brewster, B., Kavanagh, J. H., Lewis, T. E., Locke, G. and Montag, W. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1992), L'Avenir Dure Longtemps, suivi de Les Faits. Edited by Corpet, O. and Boutang, Y. M. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
Baltas, A. (1989), “Louis Althusser and Joseph D. Sneed: A Strange Encounter in Philosophy of Science?” in K. Gavroglou, Y. Goudaroulis, and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 269–286.10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, A. (1986), The Shaky Game. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1992), “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem”, in Cohen, R. S. and Laudan, L. (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honour of Adolf Grünbaum. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 111–127.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1963), Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar