Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:15:58.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infrared Cancellation and Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael E. Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantum field theories containing massless particles are divergent not just in the ultraviolet but also in the infrared. Infrared divergences are typically regarded as less conceptually problematic than ultraviolet divergences because there is a cancellation mechanism that renders measurable physical observables such as decay rates and cross-sections infrared finite. In this article, I scrutinize the restriction to measurable physical observables that is required to arrive at infrared finite results. I argue that the restriction does not necessitate a retreat to operationalism about the meaning of the theory, but it does call attention to underappreciated features of the infrared regime.

Type
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 88 , Issue 5 , December 2021 , pp. 1125 - 1136
Copyright
Copyright 2021 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am thankful to David Albert, Sean Carroll, John Dougherty, Kerry McKenzie, Chip Sebens, Porter Williams, and audiences at Columbia and Caltech for helpful discussion. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

Bloch, F., and Nordsieck, A.. 1937. “Note on the Radiation Field of the Electron.” Physical Review 52:54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. S. 2017. “The State Is Not Abolished, It Withers Away: How Quantum Field Theory Became a Theory of Scattering.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 60:46–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N., and Rosenfeld, L.. 1933. Zur frage der messbarkeit der elektrimagnetischen feldgrössen. Mathematisk-fysiske meddelelser 12, 1–65. K⊘benhavn: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Bohr, N., and Rosenfeld, L.. 1950. “Field and Charge Measurements in Quantum Electrodynamics.” Physical Review 78:794–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. S. 1992. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, D. 1982. “The Physical State Space of Quantum Electrodynamics.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 85 (1): 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. M. 1953. “The Mathematics of Second Quantization.” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 74 (2): 222–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, A. 2012. The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J., and Fraser, D.. 2006. “Haag’s Theorem and Its Implications for the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory.” Erkenntnis 64:305–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R. P. 1969. “Very High-Energy Collisions of Hadrons.” Physical Review Letters 23:1415–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, K. O. 1951. “Mathematical Aspects of the Quantum Theory of Fields.” Pts. 1 and 2. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 4 (2–3): 161–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzykson, C., and Zuber, J.. 2012. Quantum Field Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, T. 1962. “Mass Singularities of Feynman Amplitudes.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 3:650–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. D., and Nauenberg, M.. 1964. “Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities.” Physical Review 133:B1549–B1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. E. 2016. “Haag’s Theorem, Apparent Inconsistency, and the Empirical Adequacy of Quantum Field Theory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 801–20.Google Scholar
Muta, T. 1987. “Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics: An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories.” World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics 5:1–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, M., and Schroeder, D.. 1995. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Frontiers in Physics. New York: Westview.Google Scholar
Schweber, S. 2011. An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Srednicki, M. 2007. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D. 2019. “What Is Orthodox Quantum Mechanics?” In Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics, ed. Cordero, A.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1965. “Infrared Photons and Gravitons.” Physical Review 140:B516–B524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S.. 1995. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wightman, A. S. 1964. “La théorie quantique locale et la théorie quantique des champs.” Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique 1 (4): 403–20.Google Scholar
Yennie, D. R., Frautschi, S. C., and Suura, H.. 1961. “The Infrared Divergence Phenomena and High-Energy Processes.” Annals of Physics 13, 379–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar