Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:39:24.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inferring Coevolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Ehud Lamm  and
Ohad Kammar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss two inference patterns for inferring the coevolution of two characters on the basis of their properties at a single point in time and determine when developmental interactions can be used to deduce evolutionary order. We discuss the use of the inference patterns we present in the biological literature and assess the arguments’ validity, the degree of support they give to the evolutionary conclusion, how they can be corroborated with empirical evidence, and to what extent they suggest new empirically addressable questions. We suggest that the developmental argument is uniquely applicable to cognitive-cultural coevolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 592 - 611
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Ohad Kammar’s work was kindly supported by a University of Edinburgh School of Informatics studentship, Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance studentship, the Isaac Newton Trust grant Algebraic Theories, Computational Effects, and Concurrency, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant EP/H005633/1, and the European Research Council grant Events, Causality and Symmetry—the Next Generation Semantics. We thank Chris Banks, Sarah Covshoff, Eva Jablonka, Arnon Levy, Yoav Ram, Omri Tal, and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for many useful comments and suggestions.

References

Dediu, D., and Levinson, S. C.. 2013. “On the Antiquity of Language: The Reinterpretation of Neanderthal Linguistic Capacities and Its Consequences.” Frontiers in Language Sciences 4:397.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 2000. “The Central Role of Culture in Cognitive Evolution: A Reflection on the Myth of the ‘Isolated Mind.’” In Culture, Thought, and Development, ed. Nucci, L. P., Saxe, G. B., and Turiel, E., 19–38. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunlap, P. V., Ast, J. C., Kimura, S., Fukui, A., Yoshino, T., and Endo, H.. 2007. “Phylogenetic Analysis of Host-Symbiont Specificity and Codivergence in Bioluminescent Symbioses.” Cladistics 23 (5): 507–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, S. F., and Epel, D.. 2009. Ecological Developmental Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C.. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205 (1161): 581–98.Google Scholar
Hochberg, M. E., Rankin, D. J., and Taborsky, M.. 2008. “The Coevolution of Cooperation and Dispersal in Social Groups and Its Implications for the Emergence of Multicellularity.” BMC Evolutionary Biology 8 (1): 238. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, M. I., and Plenge, D.. 2014. “Introduction: Points of Contact between Biology and History.” In Explanation in the Special Sciences, ed. Kaiser, M. I., Scholz, O. R., Plenge, D., and Hüttemann, A., 1–23. Synthese Library 367. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C.-K., Moon, J.-Y., Lee, S.-I., and Jabłoński, P. G.. 2012. “Camouflage through an Active Choice of a Resting Spot and Body Orientation in Moths.” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25:1695–1702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karsenty, G., and Oury, F.. 2012. “Biology without Walls: The Novel Endocrinology of Bone.” Annual Review of Physiology 74 (1): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, S. T., Penn, A. S., and Watson, R. A.. 2011. “The Concurrent Evolution of Cooperation and the Population Structures That Support It.” Evolution 65 (6): 1527–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prum, R. O., and Brush, A. H.. 2002. “The Evolutionary Origin and Diversification of Feathers.” Quarterly Review of Biology 77 (3): 261–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargent, T. D. 1968. “Cryptic Moths: Effects on Background Selections of Painting the Circumocular Scales.” Science 159 (3810): 100–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schank, J. C., and Wimsatt, W. C.. 1986. “Generative Entrenchment and Evolution.” In PSA 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, ed. Fine, Arthur and Machamer, Peter K., 33–60. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2010. “Minds: Extended or Scaffolded?” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4): 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotz, K. 2010. “Human Nature and Cognitive-Developmental Niche Construction.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4): 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar