Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:15:34.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inference to the Best Explanation: Is it Really Different from Mill's Methods?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Steven Rappaport
Steven Rappaport*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy De Anza College
*
‡Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, De Anza College, Cupertino, CA 95014.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peter Lipton has attempted to flesh out a model of Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) by clarifying explanation in terms of a causal model. But Lipton's account of explanation makes an adequate explanation depend on a principle which is virtually identical to Mill's Method of Difference. This has the result of collapsing IBE on Lipton's account of it into causal inference as conceived by the Causal-Inference model of induction. According to this model, many of our inductions are inferences from effects to their probable causes, and Mill's Methods are canons to guide such inferences. Thus, Lipton's account of IBE fails to represent an advance over the already familiar Causal-Inference Model of induction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 65 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I want to thank an anonymous referee for useful comments on this paper.

References

Achinstein, P. (1992), “Inference to the Best Explanation: Or, Who Won the Mill-Whevell Debate?”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23: 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copi, I. and Cohen, C. (1994), Introduction to Logic, Ninth Edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frumerton, R. (1980), “Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation”, Philosophy of Science 47: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. (1973), Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1989), “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, reprinted in Brody, B. and Grandy, R. (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 323–328.Google Scholar
Lipton, P. (1993), Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1970), A System of Logic. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Skorupski, J. (1991), John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1978), “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice”, The Journal of Philosophy 75: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar